(Realization of Trichotomic Thinking)
→→→ Tripartite Collection 1 ←←←
Trichotomizologists as of Nov. 22, 2024
Trichotomization is a fact of development for individuals and the species, but the cultures of many institutions such as Psychology, linger in a world of dichotomization. This presents us with a very serious situation we need to address, since the so-called "mental illness" of many individuals may in fact be due to a clash between their developing consciousness into a "third realm" is having difficulty navigating a world obsessed with dichotomization that many professionals are trying to force, mold, trim, prune them into accepting as "reality", as the "real world" (as they see it and have likewise been forced to accept as an indentured servant to one's state, one's religion, or otherwise).
When an individual's behavior becomes... let us say... "more expressive" (overtly, covertly, introvertly), intervention is called upon, but mental health professionals/counselors are attempting to assess what is "bothering/troubling" someone from a "second realm" perspective in which dichotomies/dualities are preferenced. However, to be fair, they can't help themselves. Their very livelihood depends on their ability to understand and use a tool of dichotomization for dissection and interpretation to form an opinion called a diagnosis that provides them with the valuation of a prognosis. This is what their colleagues do, this is how they have been taught, and this is how they have learned to navigate a world in which their very profession is immersed in a philosophy that perpetrates and perpetuates an old value of cognitive orientation that many are experiencing various transitional states of moving on from. So what does a society do with a profession that they can rightly claim is crazy, but it is they who are primarily left with the ability to diagnose craziness in others?
Permit me to explain myself... I think the recurring appearance and use of "threes" is a gradient of cognitive processing I am tentatively labeling as "Trichotomization". It is based on the presumption that in some people it becomes more pronounced, but need not necessarily reflect a penchant for "threes" such as I and others have. I think it is an expressed illustration of an Evolutionary adaptation affecting the human brain along a path where generality is the specificity in which a person may be focused with a given orientation, relative to their circumstances. By stating such, I don't want to place myself in the position of claiming I am speaking in terms of an expressed superiority taking place in a person's brain/mind. Instead, it is "superior" in terms of an adaptive requirement like the use of a triplet code in DNA, with its influence of multiple species of life forms which can represent different ideological orientations, but can be further scrutinized to reveal their core patterning to illustrate a preferential cognitive dominance.
In other words, the Triplet code is superior because we of today note how inferior a doublet and singlet code are, and that Environmental circumstances have not issued an "edict" (pressurized constraints [pressures]... like a higher compression engine) for biology to evolve with a more-than-three code {Just as particle physics does not seem to be evolving beyond its basic "three-particle" structuring}.— I say this in light of the fact that contemplations exist about there having been a singlet and doublet code as precursors, though the ideas remain as suppositions to the extant triplet code model in DNA. However, it stands to reason according to other information discovered in biological development, that some "two stage" of development preceded the triplet stage and that the 2-stage was preceded by a 1-stage..., regardless of how they were individually contoured in their respective originating environments which may have required stops, starts, regressions, digressions, re-starts, mutations, etc... all of which can be used as an analogy to represent a developing brain/mind/consciousness... or mental/behavioral events lingering in a non-3rd position of development... though episodic developmental trends need to be taken into account to explain differences.
It stands to reason that when we see a pattern emerging from a collection of data, we need to point it out... to the point of slapping people in the face or upside their head if necessary, in order to point out a recurring sequence that others are using on a smaller scale of applying their efforts of perception to in their individualized research that many think has no comparison and is as unique as the researcher(s) think themself(s) to be. Here is another example of a first, second, third developmental occasion of the brain occurring across different species. Let me ask again, is Nature engaging in a type of Numerology we do not yet grasp the true Nature of, or is Numerology (In its broader sense of correlative comparisons), the product of a human mind projecting a reference about a formula of development we are all overlooking?
Origin of the Triplet code in DNA is viewed in terms of having followed along a 1-2-3 pattern. Please note that the use of (let us call it) a double doublet code, can be interpreted as a type of developmental "lingering" that is analogous to a cognitive preoccupation with dichotomies. (However, for those who are curious, this model does not describe 1, 2, or 3...? types of precursor to the singlet code.)
The triplet code in DNA appears to be unchanged for billions of years, making it easy for us to say it is an adaptive functionality which can also be seen in the 1-2-3 serialization of strandedness:
- RNA world emerges with a SINGLE strand, (Today it has a triplet code.)
- 3 basic types of RNA: Messenger- Ribosomal- Transfer
- DNA world emerges with a DOUBLE strand, (Today it has a triplet code.)
- 3 basic types of DNA: A- D- Z
- DNA to RNA bio molecular communication influenced Protein world to emerge with a TRIPLE helix strandedness.
- DNA to RNA bio molecular communication influenced a major important protein called Collagen to emerge with a TRIPLE helix strandedness.
In short, a 1-2-3 development of strandedness occurred. And the "3ness" keeps being repeated by Nature, including a list of threes in human anatomy. Is Nature then a Numerologist? No less, more importantly, let us note the 3rd position as being a type of train, bus or air depot, though the more common word is "station". From this station a wide variety of forms blossom to take and create different niches.
And as the different life form species began to take root, a further biological development took place with its own exhibition of a 3-part increase in complexity, featuring what we call Germ layers:
- 1st: Single (Ectoderm?..."monoploblastic") Germ layer animal life forms emerge (The sponge is sometimes referenced as a representative model.)
- 2nd: Double (Ectoderm/Endoderm)..."diploblastic" Germ layers animal life forms emerge (Jellyfish, corals, sea anemones and comb jellies.)
- 3rd: Triple (Ectoderm/Endoderm/Mesoderm)..."triploblastic" Germ layers animal life forms emerge (From earth worms to humans.)
And now, we have a working model of an idea involving 3 domains of life labeled Bacteria- Archaea- Eucaryotes, though others have proposed different category counts.
As a last example, let me reference the generalized use of the three-part phrase "One- Two- Many", when speaking of the attempts by early humans to develop a counting system, which may have initially occurred by a 1 to 1 correspondence. However, please note that though the phrase does not give any indication of how long it took for the idea of counting to take hold and adopted as a standard. And neither does it imply that the development was easy without stops, starts, and regressions. The point is that somewhere, by someone(s) the notion of the quantity "1" was established. Any count greater than one may not have at first even crossed anyone's mind until a change in cognition allowed for the idea that everything beyond the "1" was (in their own language) called Many, or Heap, Or Pile, or Bunch, or a lot, or a few,... etc. Then this reference changed into a number value we today call "2". Any notion of a greater quantity may not have had a name, since the previous names were allocated to the "2". Hence, anything greater than the "2" may have at first had no specific label of reference except for a wave of the hand or arms indicating "way out there".
The point is, which occurs in infant babbling as well, is that afterwards, after the third position in a language evolving environment, an increased complexity of enumeration took place... yet, as indicated by the use of a comma after every third digit in place-value notation, the same basic cognitive pattern is being used (123,456,789,+...).
An increasing complexity in enumeration is not difficult to be understood as an indication of a change in human cognitive activity, whether you describe it as a higher consciousness, higher intelligence, or simply exchange the word "higher" with "different". Nonetheless, we can see a change, for good or ill, due to what we believe to be an alteration in the macro and/or micro environment... whether we can itemize specificities or not.
In addition to the above points, is it a coincidence or Numerology to note that the a trend in the cognition of humanity has developed the idea of three models for the Universe by way of Mathematical assessments labeled Flat, Spherical, Saddle-shaped? Or that we have three primary theories for the Evolution of Human Migration which appears to coincide with the 3 types of evolution?
Those readers who have a preferential orientation towards the use of dichotomies (such as seen in Psychology and Mathematics), may well take exception to the use of three" model of comparison.
However, not every person... just like not every culture, develops with the same cognitive result, even if they have the potential to do so. Like primitives, some people can be stuck in what can be described as "one" world of cognitive activity, or even somewhere between a one and two, if not at a two or between a two and the 3rd position. While some try to elaborate and create a calculus relevant to their mindset, this does not mean they have actually attained what some might call a "higher" knowledge, truth, perception, understanding, insight, etc... To themselves and like-minded others they have, but not in terms of an actual "advanced" state of cognitive activity relevant to environmentally influenced alterations which others are experiencing. but may have no formally recognized social standard for realizing the full potential of their cognitive changes. The situation is worse and more serious when it becomes known that many professionals exist in a "two" world of functional cognitive activity alternatively described as dualities or dichotomies. Hence, the idea of a cognitive development called "Trichotomization" will be an unknown, and they will want everyone to live in their world of duality.
Not everyone comes to the realization of "threes" as a peaceful transition from one mindset to another. While in school the "loss of mind" (so to speak) is expected and accepted as one progresses in knowledge. Hence, it is of necessity to lose one's mind in order to gain a better one. However, if a person is no longer attending school... and in fact hasn't gone to school for quite awhile and for some reason they begin experiencing the perception of a particular repetition, it can be unsettling to the point of becoming an increasing distraction... if not regressing to a mindful act of wrestling with dichotomies. Some may attempt to convey their repeated experiences to others in their social sphere... be it family, friends, neighbors, co-workers, strangers at stores, etc... Yet, if the conversations do not reveal enough information, they may seek out other sources such as magazines, books, the library and the internet.
Others on the other hand may begin to create a written collection as a means of judging how many and how often the repetitions appears to them, either as a singular, a few, or group of examples. If they are young, like I was so many decades ago, they might appear to be a person becoming consumed by the activity of spending more and more time in a library with a desk filled with different types of encyclopedias. Because religious and Mathematical texts did not offer a variability of examples, (at least I couldn't find any when I was young)... what they offered was either too cryptic or so simplistic as to create a useless boredom. The sciences and technology were the most fertile ground from which to discover thousands of different perspectives from different writers who saw patterns which they sometimes expressed with a numerical value, that I gladly added to my list. Sometimes writers will use number symbols and at other times number words, or place ideas into three-part groupings such as bulleted points or even questions. The point is, I want to point out that the same sort of activity may be occurring today in different parts of the world. We do not know how many people have developed a penchant for "perceiving patterns -of- three."
If a person's interest is sincere yet their knowledge base and experiences are few (but may seem like a lot due to intensity of emotion for a few repetitions occurring over extended periods of their life according to their repetitious type of interpretation), they may find themselves discovering multiple references to Numerology or Religion, because society has not created a wide-ranging commercial exploitation for the idea of trichotomization.
In other words, there are multiple references for explaining repetition in a favorable way being offered by religion, Eastern Philosophy and Numerology (which includes gambling), but all others such as Psychology and Mathematics and multiple scientific venues, engage in the use of negativity when confronted by someone expressing a repetition of threes... even though both of these institutions of supposed higher learning have a repeating base of duality, like computers and the old Chinese yin/yang idea (though the idea of tonal/non-tonal languages remains as well, even if subjects themselves are not described in this manner):
Dualities in basic Computer Language
Psychology, Mathematics, Religion, and computing can only take us so far not only because of their reliance on a limiting duality base, but because they force all of humanity to adopt their underlying dichotomous orientations, reinforced by Education systems and government policies (From Abortion, through Climate concerns, Equality, Poverty, War, Xenophobia and Zoomorphic characterizations.) The current standard is for Human thinking and consciousness to submit (like a slave, indentured servant or devout/groveling worshiper), or to drug/distract/dement itself into compliance, or engage in socially acceptable forms of sacrifice/suicide (for one's country, one's religion, one's job, one's marriage, one's social group, etc...
Indeed, we have a serious problem that may well culminate in an intellectual battle between those who see and think within the boundary of dualities/dichotomies (where they remain almost entirely ignorant of/oblivious to trichotomization or express it in individualized traditions and rationalized over-valuations expressed in enculturations assumed as a legal or sacred indemnity) and those who see and think within the boundary of trichotomies (who are very much aware of their perennial state of a dualistic oriented mind.)
Due to this situation, it is of need to consider that we are dealing with an on-going Neuroses which has infected Psychology, Religion, and Mathematics, but computer experts are striving to minimize its effect on them by developing a quantum computing -trinary language, perhaps in the fashion of a three-part (subject- object- verb) word order, to supersede the use of Boolean logic's three basic gates: And-Or-Not. (As a footnote: Which I am using as both an analogy and metaphor, though in retrospect it appears to be another example of an embellished duality similar to that found in Syllogisms such as the well known "Major Premise, Minor Premise, Conclusion", but also displayed in the I Ching with its triads that are actually biads/dyads.)
Nonetheless, what I eventually encountered was negativity for my collection by some who used the word "Numerology" as a weapon to discourage and inflict pain on my efforts. But I resisted their insults and assaults which brought me into conflict with multiple authority figures who insisted I toe-the-line by complying to what I did not recognize at the time was a perspective and behavioral regime of duality. The same thing could be occurring in multiple places around the world. If a person lives in a highly religious community with a socially enforced opinion that they turn their energies towards a religion, or some other subject, the person may do so... however reluctantly, and as well... suppress their interest in "getting to know the nature of threes." Both the Sciences and Technology are best for this, even though there are numerical patterns in Nature, they are too few... with the largest ones being the Fibonacci series and the associations to the Golden mean (ratio). However, neither mathematics or religion or eastern philosophy provides adequate information on the variability of patterns in Nature such as the Origin of the triplet code, the recurrence of tripartition in developmental cognition, and how this relates to the ongoing deteriorations of the planet and planetary system.
Another weapon that might be attempted against someone interested in the threes phenomena is to label it as an Obsessive-Compulsive disorder. How ridiculous! Since the large collection of threes a person may ultimately have includes numerous examples from tested and testable facts, this speaks of what can be viewed as a chronology of events related to changes in human cognitive activity illuminating the vagaries of existence in recurring patterns that every single subject attempts to chronicle in its own way. In short, a compilation of threes provides us with a history of cognitive activity concerning the development of perceptions related to reality. We simply need to put them on a timeline. And though you can see different religions providing their perspectives of reality in a chronological manner such as is stated by the old phrase: "In the beginning" ..., it is a wholly ignorant account of so very many discoveries. If you wish to remain ignorant and teach such ignorance to others, then by all means, teach your religion.
Using a "Threes" methodology as a tool, however crude or simplistic you might initially view it, we can nonetheless map out a developmental trend which in some cases explicitly exhibits a 1 -2- 3 maturational sequence such as the 3 Germ layers. Take a look at the following handful of examples and visually project them into a working memory of chronological appearances over time with respect to being expressions of a developing cognition/consciousness. Yes they are human created categories, but look at the numerical value we humans have assigned to the ideas, as if we think like primitives whose developmental usage of a number sequence is limited.
The phrase "one-two-many" can be used to highlight the mind of primitive peoples in their assent of developing a sense of enumeration. The 3rd position is the point of demarcation similar to that seen in the modern sense of arithmetical notation where we mark off the hundreds place from the thousands, (ones-tens-hundreds -comma- thousands...) and continue to use groups of three delineated by commas. (Perhaps analogous to the 3 stops and 1 start codon in genetics.) You may claim it as Numerology, but you're missing the point in connection with human cognition. If it is so simple to recognize, why isn't everyone doing it? Why isn't it common knowledge? I submit it takes a change in consciousness and that some are transitioning into this but are being met with opposition from their culture and professionals such as mental health workers, counselors, teachers, work place bosses, family, friends, etc...
Indeed, if one reacts combatively to a list of "threes" presented to them and claims they can see other numerical patterns such as twos, sevens, etc., then why doesn't the majority see this? For example, why is it that only a few researchers have noticed the persistence of dualities in psychology, and yet how many of you have not come to find someone speaking of the many underlying dualities in Mathematics, similar to those found in the Binary code of computers and the old Chinese yin/yang idea? A "threes" tool can be used as a means of dissecting human cognitive development from a different perspective.
- 3 geometries of the Universe derived from mathematics: Flat, Spherical, Saddle-shaped
- 3 dimensional reality: Width - Height - Depth
- 3 most commonly cited "forces of nature": Gravity - Electromagnetism - Strong nuclear force
- 3 forces corresponding to Standard Model: Electromagnetism - Strong nuclear force- Weak nuclear force
- 3 forms of matter on Earth: Solids- Liquids- Gasses (plasma outside Earth)
- 3 families of fundamental particles
- 3 main large particles: Protons- Neutrons- Electrons
- 3 quarks/3 anti-quarks
- 3 quarks to protons and neutrons
- 3rds fractionation used to describe Energies of particles
- 3 atomic radiations: Alpha- Beta- Gamma
- 3 laws of motion
- 3 laws of planetary motion
- 3rd planet: Earth
- 3 basic divisions to Earth: core- mantle- crust
- 3 domains of life: Bacteria- Archaea- Eucaryota
- RNA world: 1-strand, triplet code
- 3 main RNA types: Messenger- Transfer- Ribosomal
- DNA arrival: 2-stands, triplet code
- 3 Main DNA types: A- B- Z
- 3 Stranded collagen arrives
- 3 folding strands of basic protein structure (secondary- tertiary- quaternary) + 1 non-folding primary
- 3 types of protein in the human body: Globular- Fibrous- Membrane
- 3 laminar appearance of cell membrane (trilaminar appearance, but called bilipid)
- 3 germ layers: Ectoderm- Ectoderm- Mesoderm (developed along a 1-2-3 sequence)
- 3 basic divisions to insects: Head- Thorax- Abdomen
- 3 body types: Ectomorph- Mesomorph- Endomorph
- 3 basic fingerprint types: Loop- Whorl- Arch
- 3-patterned Anatomy: List of 3's in human anatomy
At what point in the above list of facts does the idea of Numerology enter your mind? The first item? The second? The third? How far did you get with your penchant for thinking in patterns-of-two, before reacting negatively to it? Were you intellectually taxed? Over-whelmed? Then heaven forbid I present you with a hundred or more examples. Granted I would agree it is Numerology if I presented a list of examples from religion, but even Religion has engaged in using this value to represent superior ideas or attributes of a superior person, such as the Trinity and threes in the ministry of Jesus. However, forget the religious part of it and look at the pattern as an expressed effort of the human brain attempting to exercise a developmental "urge" (environmental influence) within the context (time period, education) of a given individual.
If you grew up among ancient humans, you might well express the "three" in some geometric form such as a triangle-shaped tool or use of a pointed stick, if your clan's accepted grunts were an insufficient vocabulary. If the 3 is but an emblem of a brain trying to evolve, then the conditions it occurs in a given individual in their respective era and environment will determine the way in which it is illustrated. Religion has its own, Architecture its own, Music its own, etc... One example from the LGBTQ+ crowd is that some refer to themselves as a Third, and superior species, despite the low intelligence needed for a sexual and/or gender orientation/identity so many are obsessed with.
The occasion for the development of a singular, double and triple perceptual orientation gives the impression they are occurring as transitional stages of perception that some people can get appreciably stuck in one or another, or slide through the spectrum under different circumstances. While there are regressive moments seen in biological development, and we see a version of this when an old person with senility becomes like an infant or child, and a middle aged person acts like a teenager who never grew up; the point is that differences in the development of human cognition/consciousness might well be identified by patterns which we can enumerate. Historically for example, the modern use of the words "triad, triunity, three, trinity" etc., were not used by ancient peoples when they displayed three-patterned characterizations in worshipping gods, many of which are now called mythologies. The triple structure for them in their time represented a super or higher state of realized consciousness exhibited externally. The same goes for Hitler's 3rd Reich, that not everyone believed in, but he did. In genetics we see this described as a triplet code. In anatomy we see this illustrated in the numerous 3-part structures which many anatomists see, but do not acknowledge as a recurring pattern worthy of making a comment about or pursuing it with any further interest as an expression of an environmentally influenced Evolutionary development in human cognition.
We see the same thing in the use of three colors for street lights the world over. Also In the description of three fundamental families of particle physics. We even see the need for a Trinary language for a quantum computer to go beyond the present Binary language of computers, to which we presently use Boolean logic to provide us with the 3 basic gates of And- Or- Not, so as to extend the possibilities and potentialities of limitation inherent in the use of a binary code. We see this again in the use of Three Germ layers which superseded the use of two for less complex life forms. With so many examples of transition taking place in multiple subjects, it seems rather silly we have not applied this to the development of consciousness which can express itself in different ways (like multiple species), but the core design appears to be immutable in the use of a triplet code. How that code expresses itself in different people, different cultures, in different eras requires the use of a different type of comparison that we might initially reference as a bio-psycho-social tool of examination, but not limit ourselves to a strict observance of this set-of-three applications.
A good example of a "3" consciousness showing up in Philosophy can be seen here: Triadism and the Universal Categories by Charles Sanders Peirce. In his era and profession, his penchant for "threeness" was exercised with the language and knowledge available at the time. However, while his expressions of 1stness, 2ndness, 3rdness have been studied and discussed; the present day field of cognitive and neural psychology do not know what to make of the "3" as an expression of human consciousness. When you strip away the current application of quantity and symbolism, what is it referencing in terms of an evolutionary exercise of developmental cognition, when we can see multiple exercises of the the same mental expression in every subject... albeit not as elaborately expressed by most people as we find in peirce's philosophy. Why this route and not some other number pattern? And why hasn't anyone pursued some other singular pattern with the same intensity?
While context and era can explain the use of multiple triads in ancient religions as expressions of some "higher" cognitive realization in an illustrated form (many of which are called mythologies today), why does nature apparently use the same pattern... or are the examples we cull from nature mere human created substitutions of an ongoing process seen in the triplet code and three germ layers, representing a survival mechanism in an incrementally deteriorating planetary system? Is trichotomization linked to the species' attempted acknowledgement of responses to a deteriorating environment within its physiological sphere of sensibility for doing so, which means more people in the future will be sensitive to an acknowledgment of Trichotomization and psychologists/psychiatrists are going to have their hands full of patients in the dichotomy/trichotomy transition mode?
A high level of intelligence does not appear to be a prerequisite for experiencing a developmental change in consciousness, but it is a requirement for the identification and utilization of differences in controlled exploratory excursions so as not to panic if one gets the feeling of having lost a recognizable point of orientation by which to navigate... unless one is truly adventurous and severs whatever intellectual umbilical cord they are using.
Please note we have a recurring triplet code from which the majority of life arises. And we have a recurring 3-Germ layer setup. As far as we can see, there is no further numerical development for either process. They remain at a "3" station like a fundamental requirement. If this is true, then the use of "twos" (dualities, dichotomies) by human consciousness may be a precursor to a "three" model of consciousness with variable transition rates and expressions (having to navigate in a dichotomously oriented business, government, and religious terrains... not to mention the ideological constraints used by duality oriented mental health/counseling professionals).
If I include examples of "threes" from religion and mythology, let us note that in the context of an ancient mind, such triadic/three-some models were ascribed to gods and leaders as a type of super-awareness, an enhanced connection... a fundamental pattern that we might today called a higher consciousness. The "3" is used as both a label and definition of some ultimate achievement, which is more than mere quantity, which is an idea well known to those who study the anthropology of enumeration. In other words, we of today use the "3" and words like triple, triad, trinity, etc... but in the past they did not. There mind created a pattern which defined an expression of a consciousness trying to exercise an effort to move beyond... even though the word "consciousness" is a modern term and what the human brain is doing may be something altogether different in terms of its potential for an evolutionary-like development.
Something is clearly taking place and the recurring "3" indicator provides us with a shadow, an echo, a reverberation, a tell-tale sign, a sense, a tip-of-the-brain allusion, or whatever label you want to apply to point it out. However, the actions of very many professionals prevent the trial and error efforts of the human brain from developing in this direction. It imposes its preference for dichotomization by calling it normal, sanity, and in all versions/variations... in touch with reality... THEIR reality taught to them in a school system that is oblivious to a bio-psycho-social idea involving a developing consciousness wrestling with a transition between a dominantly taught dichotomous reality and the reality of a fledgling trichotomous one.
You may call the above list Numerology or an obsessive-compulsive disorder (despite it being particularly ordered), but if someone comes to you and speaks of it as an indication that it may be a tell-tale sign that human cognition/consciousness is developing along a different channel than the dichotomous standard being used by psychologists, how are you to counsel them? How does a Neanderthal Shaman thinking in terms of dichotomies counsel a Cro-magnon thinking in terms of trichotomies? Will the dominant Psychology institutions of Neanderthals who use dichotomies try to gang up on the trichotomous thinking Cro-magnons and force them to retreat from their supposed delusion and get back to the reality of duality that the Neanderthals are most comfortable with? While the analogy may appear humorous to some, it is actually quite serious. More serious than the presence of a dominant right-handed society imposing its preferences on left handed people.
What if society wakes up one day and is confronted by large crowds of trichotomous thinking individuals who want equality in educational instruction, counseling, and every other aspect of living? Even though the U.S. government is in three parts (Legislative- Executive- Judicial, but often functions as one or two) and colleges routinely have three degrees (Bachelor's- Master's- PhD) with 3 distinct Latin awards (Cum laude, Magna cum laude, Summa cum laude) and we use a 3-drug cocktail for some executions... we have a Psychology standard of duality, a Mathematics standard of duality, a computer language standard of duality... with each of them displaying efforts to exercise some effort of developing a "three" structure... and yet nobody is thinking in terms that this is a tell-tale sign that the human mind is making an evolutionary transition towards a trichotomization standard that is coming into conflict with the present usage of duality standards of thinking by different professionals.
When we can see genetic and biological (as well as ideological) expressions of a 1-2-3 developmental sequencing, so why are we stubbornly sticking to a refusal to recognize the dichotomy/trichotomy transition, or its absence and an attempt to revive that which may be buried under a layer of imposed dualities?
When we have thousands of psychologists who are not even aware of the dichotomy/trichotomy situation and they come from schools invested in teaching dichotomies, increased occurrences of trichomotization in consciousness may be the cause of multiple conflicts... being exacerbated by an outdated system of medical intervention using dichotomization as its standard tool of diagnosis and prognosis. The same goes for the currency of politics and leaderships.
But the same goes for Mathematics, despite it very much greater utility. It too is a repository of Ignorance, and can only take humanity so far by relying on an underlying orientation of dichtomization. Particularly when millions of people are not taught there is a persistence of duality underlying it operations akin to the simplistic two-patterned mental associations seen in the old Chinese idea of the Yin/Yang. Oh, heaven forbid that I exclude the mention of a similar persistence in Psychology and that the Persistent Dualities are a keynote in the identification of mental illness: What is dichotomous Thinking and that it is recognized as The persistence of mind-brain dualism in psychiatric reasoning about clinical scenarios:
Despite attempts in psychiatry to adopt an integrative biopsychosocial model, social scientists have observed that psychiatrists continue to operate according to a mind-brain dichotomy in ways that are often covert and unacknowledged and suggest that the same intuitive cognitive schemas that people use to make judgments of responsibility lead to dualistic reasoning among clinicians. The goal of this study was to confirm these observations.
This three-part "Bio-Psycho-Social" model requires the acknowledgement that Trichotomization is very real, and may well signal an Evolutionary expression of a developing "higher" consciousness, which is having difficulty to unfold because the standard orientation of reality amongst many professionals, their institutions and multiple other social entities such as government and education... is towards an out-dated use of dichotomization... because such institutions and their professionals have failed to recognize their own fledgling attempts to permit Trichotomization to unveil. For example, while education systems teach mathematics, it does not teach students to recognize it is based on dualities while several of its attempts have been to create three-patterned math models such as Trigonometry and Boolean Algebra applied to the limitations of Binary logic used in computers, by way of the And- Or- Not gates. Teaching professions the world over do not recognize nor teach the value of Trichotomization as a conceptual paradigm. Ideas which stress a "rule of three" is on the level of a kindergarten show-and-tell instruction. Psychology classes around the world are teaching its students to profess a usage of dichotomization but remain ignorant of Trichotomization.
Many of the so-called mental problems and social issues involve differences in perception which are changing from a practiced dichotomization to a surfacing trichotomization either finding cryptic ways of expression or ways to suppress the realization.
However, instead of incorporating a new idea with an actual view of Trichotomization, we find that the idea of a 3rd option is to reframe duality, such as in this example which embraces duality: How to improve your mental health through duality. The word Trichotomization and its related Bio-Psycho-Social model appears not so much as being a taboo subject, but as an unrealized reality among professionals who have been taught to think in dualistic terms, such as the ancient Mind/Body issue more commonly stated as a problem.
Note: This page is an introduction to a short series I am presently working on dealing with the Dichotomization/Trichotomization issue. It is a problem not adequately being addressed by Psychology or Philosophy.)
Date of Origination: Friday, 22nd November, 2024... 4:31 AMInitial Posting: Friday, 22nd November, 2024... 6:29 AM
Updated Posting: Sunday, 1st December, 2024... 6:51 AM