Problem Investigators as of May 6th, 2025
If it's not a barrage of little things bothering you, do you find yourself wondering if your are crazy? Do you wonder if you're out-of-synch with some supposed Normalcy...or out of touch with the reality of the era to which you find yourself in? Have you felt as if you are losing it? And if your self-assessments, those reflections of yourself when compared to others that for some reason or another you have chosen to compare yourself with and create some internalized measurement chart like that used when marking how tall you are getting in childhood are not excused by some alternative assessment and labeling such as doing and thinking what you do because of some creative sensibility which necessitates soee eccentricity, or that you are an Old Soul, or have an artistic flair, or you are an original thinker... perhaps even a genius not routinely realized but perhaps suspected, all of which may be colloquially compartmentalized into view of being an overlooked talent... how then are you describe the situation you find yourself in if you come to believe you are out of touch with something you may only losely describe as a required tell-tale sign of being sane?
Then again, maybe it's someone else you know that apparently exhibits characteristics which they dome to find are being interpreted to suggest they have a problem that is being assessed and labeled in the context by so-called authority or parental or leadership figures whose vocabulary and knowledge are oriented towards a given profession in a given manner in collusion with others having a similar limitation of vocabulary and knowledge. Whether you view it trite or not, the phrase one person's trash is another person's treasure aptly explains a consideration you may not be taking into account. Similarly, one person's level of intelligence or defined creativity is another person's assessed ignorance and mediocrity.
For example, an immigrant family having moved to the US has a child who graduates high school and college are viewed as momentums occasions because no one in the family or any other family they are friends with, have had a family achieve such accomplishments... though such achievements are view in terms of mediocrity and commonplace expectation by many Natural born US families. And even though the child may have received straight A's and participated in advanced placement studies, they are encountering the same problems when seeking employment that other graduated individuals. In such a situation, many minority students may choose to think in terms of prejudice, discrimination, gender, age, inexperience, job market applicability of one's degree, job market environment in a given geographic location, etc... Other students may disinclude the topic of discrimination and prejudice, but include some of the same criteria for assessing their problem in getting a job. The bottom line to their assessment of their situation results in creating an interpretation designed as a dichotomy in terms of creating a mental ledger of reasons or excuses under the headings of problems aligned with external or internal circumstances, that they may further decide to employ a second dichotomy of 'top down' or 'bottom up' hierarchality. Yes, many people think in hierarchical terms for some, many or most all of their perceptually accumulated knowledge. And some of them apparently begin to sustain a digression towards assessments where the view and/or feeling of a problem is present and becomes an over-riding preoccupation.
Preoccupations can become so frequent that they lead a person into the territory of being neurotic... which actually is the normative case for humanity. Humorously noted, we're all crazy. The more intelligent you are the more readily you will agree. However, whereas simple problems can become compounded to initiate a neurotic personality, more intensified the problems become, the more neurotic a person becomes to the extent they experience a psychosis. However, if you are sane or experience a heightened realization of super-sanity because your consciousness has begun a more concerted trek into what can be described as a super-consciousness, problems occur not so much because you are evolving a higher consciousness, but how it is being used, interpreted, and labeled. If you're religious, as I will again mention later as an example, you may necessarily use and describe your evolving consciousness in terms of the common themes and vocabulary found in your particular religious orientation. Instead of labeling it an "Enlightenement" as one might do if they are involved with some Eastern-influenced philosophy, or as a "transcendental Experience", you may well use such terms as Revelation, or spiritual experience. If you are steeped in Mathematics, particle Physics, or some other subject that may or may not have a developed sense and vocabulary for explaining experiences of heightened awareness, hyper-vigilance, super-positioning of mind, super-imposed relativities, etc., the experiences of a developing consciousness may prove to be unsettling or even problematic to the point of disrupting your once accustomed to life style. Indeed, your friends, colleagues, co-workers, neighbors, famil, etc., may think you have a problem since your former behavior was used by them as a bouy maker as to how they charted a course in their life. A change in your behavior altered the position of the bouy, which in some circumstances may have been a shoreline, lighthouse or weather pattern for some people to orient themselves to/with. They become unstable and may seek to force you to return to "your old self" or move closer to others who can then be substituted for the points on the compass in their particular venue of consciousness, which has not experienced a leap of development as yours has.
Similarly, the overall behavior of students has an assessed value of normalcy used by parents, teachers, counselors and administrators. Yet, the criteria of normalcy is based on a foundation of various dichotomies. The same goes for politics, religion, sports, the persistence of dichotomies in psychology, mathematics, and computer language, but no less exists in basic double-entry commerce accounting, playground equipment functionality, etc... While the idea of dichotomization since the advent of the ancient Chinese Yin/Yang philosophy made its debut in written form thousands of years ago, the idea that the human brain/mind is advancing along a course which uses the tool of Trichotomization, is not widely known, much less appreciated. And this is the issue for the state of human "problems". While the consciousness of humans advance or retreat on an individual basis in punctuated, intermittent, or stepwise fashions, such a development is having to confront a social reality in which the idea of Trichotomization is largely non-existent. Individuals are having to deal with differentiate types of conflict with a consciousness using some model of trichotomization as a stepping stone towards fulfilling a greater enlightenment whose realization is being hijacked, ambushed, and placed into a culturally stylized indentured servitude by various institutions (in particular Eastern philosophy but also western religion, Paganism, Wiccanism, Scientology, Masonic teachings, security service employment), military battle training, law, etc...) to provide for a means to support their own ideological existence. In each case you will see a usage of tripartition, but there is no acknowledged realization for the existence of Trichotomization as a identifiable developmental theme as the do for an ideological presence of dichotomization.
You must be insane for not getting drunk on the stupefying ideological elixir frothing from the mouths of feminists (lesbian or otherwise) engaged in a narcissistically contoured intellectualized masturbatory intercoursing involving their own anal-ized repository of pseudo-scientific, philosophical and political models of dichotomization. And you must be totally mad for not believing in the Black Lives Matter ideology that likewise pursues a similarly developed self-styled narcissism. No less, you must be certifiably insane for not taking part in their street-side celebratory exercises of self-congratulation where free booze and drugs may... on occasion be found along with pick-pockets, and concealed mischievous manipulative machinations only the truly observant are privy to deciphering the need to pull back the curtain and expose the hypocrisy.
Let us admit that you present your friends, family, teachers, your school, your culture, your society, your nation... with a problem because you refuse to adopt some standardized method for viewing the world in an established dichotomous orientation. My gosh! What's wrong with you for not believing in the nonsense of dualities the religious leaders in you community are trying to convince you is the so-called real world. Or the mathematics teacher trying to get you to develop an unrecognized adherence to the use of a standardized set of dualities. Or your parents saying "My Way or The Highway!" Or the policing community watching you and creating a level of paranoia that directs you along a path where you can be arrested and "legally" labeled as a problematic person who is up to no good, will not turn into a productive citizen, unless you comply with their embraced dualisms of right/wrong, good/bad, normal/not normal, compliant/non-compliant, etc...
While multiple people may think of you as a harmless nut case, they don't realize that the differences in thinking arise from a separate occasion of collectivized versus individualized development in consciousness. Because there is no standardized model for training or guiding a developing consciousness that is wrongly being interpreted to be an indication of some purported enlightened spirituality by those whose definitions are based on tradition or specialized, secretive knowledge because they neither have the vocabulary nor personal experience to persuasively explain or provide instructive direction for establishing a personalized discipline so that one's developing consciousness can further than any human has yet achieved and can not be defined in any known religious, spiritual, metaphysical or socially labeled (business or governmental or educational) sense.
Are you or your child, or someone else you might know... Crazy? Out of touch with reality... or simply noted as "having a problem" not attributable to actual deformations in body, mind, heart/spirit? Why shouldn't a person who is experiencing a shift in consciousness have a problem when confronted by a world in which a dominant orientation of dichotomization is required yet their brain is attempting to use some model of trichotomization? Why shouldn't you or your child be required to take some chemical restraint called medication or self-medicated by way of alcohol, drugs, rebelliousness, criminality, or isolation? Shame on you for not believing in the dichotomies of your religion. Shame on you for not seeing the world in colors as proposed by those of the LGBTQ+ whose individual and social identity is oriented towards the solidification of the duality between binary and non-binary obsessions being camouflaged by displaying an assumed supreme democracy of all=inclusiveness... so long as you adhere to its pre-occupational delusions? When the LGBTQ is just a differently styled box of dichotomous orientations whose publicly personalized avocations are privately laughed at, shame on you for looking past their self-centeredness that is little more than a "sillygism" (syllogism) defined as an alternative logic... but advances their own underlying obsessions with a dichotomous world-view.
There are a lot of different thematic scenarios which evoke intellectualized histrionic cul-de-sacs from different personally embraced issues labeled as personal or external circumstances creating both individual and group problems. Each labeled problem merits its own attention of consideration. My intent is not thus organized. I am merely presenting examples which the reader may or may not agree with. While some problems are akin to temporary illnesses, others require long term intervention. However, humanity as a whole is not recovering from the multitude problems created by the established use and acknowledgement of dichotomies, and the lack of knowledge about trichotomization or its misinterpretation and application by those who are otherwise sincere and courageous in their efforts to devise a means by which a developing consciousness by a single individual or group can find some semblance of being understood and assisted in further development. No present day Western religion, Eastern philosophy or intellectualized study such as Scientology, nor enculturated esoteric practice such as the Masonic lodge, Wiccanism, Paganism, arts of divination, etc... are presently up to the task. All of them are bound to closely to modernized variations of antiquated traditions and ceremonialism. All of them at sometime or another with individuals or groups, create conflicts arising from the differences of orientation involving standardized dualities and the tool of trichotomization where individuals and groups are themselves directed towards the usage of some ancient triad-styled relic, though a few manage engage in the adoption of an idea and/or emblem of their own design, with or without ceremonialism and accompanying dress code, language, diet, armaments, coinage, etc...
If some influential person, group, religion, journalist, gang, sports team, government, institution, god/goddess, evil, or Natural event wants to label you as having a problem that needs to be dealt with... whatever may be their motive... you may find yourself in a position much like The Death of Socrates who chose to drink hemlock... or worse, The death of Joan of Arc, who was burned at the stake... or in terms of a larger biological genocide, The Great Dying (aka: the Permian–Triassic extinction event), that can be approached like an unsolved murder case involving a group of: NASA-funded sleuths. However, despite individual problems, humanity is faced with a very large problem as being outlined on this page.
Note: In the present topic in which I try to express an opinion that multiple so-called "problems" stem from a misunderstanding of developmental consciousness which may not be solely isolated with the human species since some people think that all of existence is a consciousness and that all things have their own variety, it is of need to point out a widespread currency of thought involving monalities-dualities-pluralities, in contrast to a defeciency in an orientation of triplicity. If, as I suggest, that human consciousness follows a similar 1-2-3 maturational development sequence... though not always by way of a smooth transition, there is a need to highlight where humanity presently stands in its conceptual efforts to develop a third world (so to speak in vague terms), where a "three" orientation is configured into a more comprehensive realization then is currently in vogue, and has not substantially progressed for multiple centuries.
Hence, simply put, individuals who are experiencing a developmental shift in consciousness towards what might be loosely described as a tripartite functionality of usage, will necessarily on many occasions come into conflict with those who do not actively practice even the merest allowance for such a world view orientation that most likely may not be accurately articulated, and therefore not consciously acknowledged as a possibility influencing a person's so-called "problem" which emerges as a presumed problem because the standard socialization of most people is to accept and adopt a usage of an other-than model of Trichotomization. Indeed, why should there not be individualized "problems" when the idea of a developmental shift in consciousness is though of in terms solely defined by labels as maturity, education, practice or even enlightenment... which fore-mostly serve to direct an individual along a course of adopting some familiar ideology involving an other-than-tripartite schema.
Whereas we accept the existence of multiple three-patterned perspectives such as three main atomic particles, Earth as the 3rd planet, DNA's triplet code, 3 Germ layers, 3 modes of common time alignment (past-present-future), etc... we are permitted to do so only in terms devised in accordance with standards developed by Institutions whose basic foundations are regulated by a Persistent Dichotomy. Our world-view of threes is not permitted to establish itself with a personalized identity that we may call Trichotomization. No, human consciousness has been placed into an indentured servitude, to serve institutions that utilize an identity of duality. The attendant consciousness of humanity is not permitted to establish its own identity, it is forced to name itself in accord with one or another households of duality. And even though the usual course for a slave in the past was to adopt the name of the household master, the consciousness of humanity desires to be set free of its bondage requirements and adopt the personalized name of Trichotomization... however crude, strange or unrealistic this may at first seem to those whose conventions of thought are steeped deeply in the economy where dualities dominate.
The so-called "problem" of multiple individuals, in different ages, occupations, etc., is that their consciousness is developing towards a 3rd tier of functionality, whatever this may mean in contrast to the present species of humanity whose cultures and institutions are appreciably caught in the quick sands of former world view adopted behavioral practices. Indeed, human consciousness wants to be set free... but not by way of drugs, drink, some idiotic adventure of a misaligned sexuality, or the very many metaphysical/spiritual intoxications. Yes, free to establish its own culture, its own governance, its own values of education and commerce. It no longer wants to be subservient to a society where dichotomization and its supportive staff regulates all major institutions. It's no wonder medication, incarceration, and other restraints are being called on all the more against a perceived problematic person or public. When institutions that rely on individualized and collectivized orientations of dichotomy and they encounter more and more individuals no longer wanting to be forced to embrace their practiced dualities (black/white, rich/poor, good/evil, etc...), what are they to do do if they refuse to comply and will not indulge in behaviors of self-inflicting measures of compliance against what they perceive is an idiocy which continues to suppress them economically, spiritually, and cognitively?
When those individuals of the LGBTQ+ clan think of themselves as a 3rd species, this is but a fragmentated splintering of a consciousness striving to move into a new developmental phase. When Hitler spoke of a 3rd Reich, or Freud and his 3 personality types, or Karl Popper and his 3 worlds, or Einstein's 3-part Mass -to- Energy equivalency formula, and the use of triads in music, or triadic ensembles of deities, or the sometimes preoccupation of a 3rd World War... all of these are fragmentated splinters of a constrained consciousness striving to free itself. But it can't reach a full identity because there is no current appreciation for the view of consciousness following a similar 1-2-3 developmental scenario that we see in multiple biological instances. All the "threes" ideas are metaphors, are grunts, are cave wall renditions of a developing brain functionality that is striving to develop a means of articulate communication with those who are deaf, dumb, and blind to its presence as a developing individual. This is why we see droves of people leaving traditional religions because their consciousness no longer aligns itself with an antiquated world view in which dichotomies are the rule-of-thumb being referenced as the staple of reality... at least from the perspective of those theologians who lack a wider berth of knowledge which many of the lay public now has. Whereas the use of one or more super-naturally oriented trichotomies (such as the Trinity, Trimurti) once sufficed as dominant representations of an enlarging consciousness, many people no longer believe in such symbolically created fairy tale metaphysics. Not only the basic foundation of dichotomies being espoused by religions, but the lack of knowledge and experience by advocates of religion are difficult for many people to swallow as truth.
There is no reason there shouldn't be a conflict of consciousness when an unrecognized development in consciousness is being confronted by unrealistic dogma being preached by simplistic-minded idiots. When both Western religions and Eastern philosophies are being attended to by those whose consciousness is playing the ritualistic part of servitude to antiquated ideologies handcuffed to dichotomies that suffocate an expansion of consciousness, from which many a false trichotomy has been developed and practiced in response to, what is a person to do if they are financially chained to a given culture with its expectations of compliance to an adopted life style where some perversion of dichotomization is being preached by all civil, business and religious authority? When we have very many examples of social activity where a three-pattern is displayed such as the U.S. government's 3 divisions of government (Legislative- Judicial- Executive), and yet its actual functionality is not based on a practice of checks -and- balances but as a singularity or duplicitous dichotomy, how are those in the public and private sectors supposed to react to a situation in which they are experiencing some measure of a developing consciousness which readily acknowledges the hypocrisies so very many different so-called "normal" social entities and institutions are trying to force the public to accept as rationale and in its best interests... while the rich and politically connected are permitted to enjoy the larger and sweeter fruits that the indentured public is forbidden to have, though they are produced by their labors?
Indeed, while the history of humanity has exposed the result of revolutions based primarily on the privations of economic prosperity due to the greed and blood thirsty avariceness of those recognized as the elite... in their respective genres of occupation and territorial supervisory roles; it has not yet seen a revolution of consciousness expansion highlighted by dramatic changes in Institutionalized philosophical foundations which have not substantially progressed for centuries. The use of Inconsistent Triads by reigning social institutions that once sufficed to satiate the intellectual yearnings of those whose consciousness was venturing towards trichotomization (typically in metaphysical/spiritual contexts and symbolism)... but not wholly or holistically so, will be regulated to the various card catalogs and other deposits of ancient history, as human consciousness further develops into its uncharted territories. The world is wholly unprepared for a populace whose initial attempts to secure a dominant state of a separate identity for the new consciousness will be to systematically erase the total body of elites from all sectors of society, but not minor leaderships or personal repositories of wealth, power. and property from those whose resources are placed at the disposal of those whose efforts are sincerely oriented towards establishing the articulated social venue of Trichotomization not arrogantly or hauntingly or discriminatingly distinct from the inconsistent triad of monism- duality- plurality, however it may be labeled or symbolically portrayed.
It is of value to portray some indication of the philosophical interest in the relevancy of different word associations involved in a discussion of trichtomization as a cognitive theme of development. Granted the sampling is from a single source which may contain only a handful of its total store of articles which have not been digitized, it nonetheless provides an entry point for such a consideration:
Despite all the negativity I have encountered from so-called professionals (and those non-professionals that provide a repetitive chorus of what some professional has said), a list of threes in their different forms and subject areas of application, is necessary in order to realize the direction, scope, and resiliency and present limitations such a pattern has, and where it is deductively absent from. Whereas you might think that a concerted study of the threes phenomena has already been attended to by Philosophers, Cognitive Psychologists, Cultural Anthropologists and others whose interests are oriented towards the functional developmental sequence of human mental activity, and that this has been contrasted with other patterns of mental activity... this is not the case. No one in the history of humanity has effectively dealt with the development of human cognition which entails the use of tools from multiple disciplines. No one has done so because all of the so-called professionals have been taught to think in terms developed in atmospheres of education and cultural experiences which are principally managed by an accounting system reliant on a monality- duality- plurality, that is presented as an actual triplicity, but is... (using the language of contemporary philosophy), an inconsistent triad... or we might call it an embellished dyad. It's just another one of those presumptuous syllogisms which I prefer to call as "silly-gisms" because they represent such a childish level of laughable stupidity.
On a separate page I have listed a handful of examples of ideas gathered from the online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, using the query term "triad". And even though the list might change next week or that some other encyclopedia might well offer a different set of examples, the survey from the SEP readily indicates that, at least with the topic of "triad", there is no one making a concerted effort to speak of the cognitive issue of "threes", much less Trichotomization. While the search query "triad" yielded some 70-odd examples, the word "three" provided but one:
-
Charles Sanders Peirce (Robert Burch):
- Merely to say that Peirce was extremely fond of placing things into groups of three, of trichotomies, and of triadic relations, would fail miserably to do justice to the overwhelming obtrusiveness in his philosophy of the number three. Indeed, he made the most fundamental categories of all “things” of any sort whatsoever the categories of “Firstness,” “Secondness,” and “Thirdness,” and he often described “things” as being “firsts” or “seconds” or “thirds.” Let us refer to Peirce’s penchant for describing things in terms of trichotomies and triadic relations as Peirce’s “triadism.”
- Let us refer to Peirce’s penchant for describing things in terms of trichotomies and triadic relations as Peirce’s “triadism.”
- But, hardly surprisingly given his penchant for triads, most of his divisions are into threes.
In using the search tern "Trichotomization", this is what was rendered:
Granted the SEP (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) is but one of several outlets of philosophical articles, it nonetheless provides some sense of the types and quantities of philosophical papers being accepted for publication. And though there may be thousands of topics not covered by the collection of authors who have made their way into the online catalog, we don't have evidence for this supposition... even if the reader counts themselves as one of these unsung authors of an original idea. No less, while I have made some effort to provide links of different authors reciting some variation of a "threes" idea, I have not collected the ideas and placed them into a catalog. Nobody I have encountered has done or is presently involved with an attempted scientific analysis of the types of philosophy papers having been published. And though I have ventured to make a very short survey of different themes, one can not be certain if the software program in use for retrieving the sought after information is not too strict or lenient, where those articles retrieved merely contain a referenced word but no comprehensive study of the same idea but the author(s) did not include the word in their work because of differences in vocabulary usage. In short, there are a lot of variables to be taken into consideration for an actual in depth analysis of published philosophical orientations. Nonetheless, despite all the caveats, let me provide a few more references, the bulk of which are placed here: .
Hold on a minute. On second thought... the aforementioned "problem" not be your problem, but that of a family member, neighbor, co-worker, boss, friend, relative, or other person you've encountered. From personal experience, I readily accept everyone else is crazy, though to mention this amongst a group of friends, I receive a barrage of counter-posed remarks stating that I am the one out of touch (with their) reality. Them again, hold on a third minute. While you might devise any number of compensatory behaviors in attempting to deal with some assumed problem such as acquiring a work-a-holic means of self-distraction... or finding some means of coping by way of inebriation such as suing alcohol, tobacco, gambling, drugs, promiscuity, caffeine, medication, etc., let us get to the root of the assumed problem you may think you or another person may have, or that you have come to agree, for example, with some authority figure that your child needs to be medicated, because the need for some chemical restraint is necessary for someone to be more amenable to standard tactics of getting someone to comply with a standard ideological format that forces a person to get on the same page as everyone else.
If some presumed problem child or adult (or yourself) has behavior that is not explained away as some eccentricity accompanying some perceived sensibility commensurate with what one thinks is a talent, giftedness, genius, smartness, artistry, or other variously described uniqueness such as labeling oneself or another as a young, old, or ancient soul...etc., then let us seek some other reason instead of jumping on the conventional bandwagon where chemical or other tool of behavioral tool of management is applied.
As such, maybe the problem does not reside in the individual, but a system they are forced to adopt to, be it a religion, government, education, etc... Indeed, perhaps a hypothetical scenario might suffice to provide a clearer understanding of what I am attempting to convey by way of analogy and metaphor:
You find yourself believing that you don't fit within the parameters of normalcy which everyone else appears to be happy with. Or you have a child that some otherwise well-meaning professional connected with their school says they need to be placed on medication, for this or that behavior that they do not come right out and label as some mode of craziness, but you allow yourself to indulge in whatever disparagement fits your own personality of bias and discrimination, even against a family member, relative, friend, co-worker, neighbor, etc., because your definition is connected with some ulterior motive that advances some concealed agenda of your own. Or, you think such a behavior in someone else is near to being a reflection of a similar event taking place in your own life, but that your experiences allow for greater concealment and excuses... because you "know how to act normal"; which becomes the common mental refuge for many a teenager having found themselves indulging in some intoxication they want to conceal. It also is a comment from a Shakespearean play ("As You Like It", specifically spoken by the character Jaques in Act II, Scene VII): "All the World's a stage, and all the men and women merely players." In the present context I am referencing the point of acting, which all of us engage in in different ways in different settings when in the presence of different characters.
While the foregoing may appear to be a round-a-bout way of conveying a situation in which the idea of non-normalcy is being experienced... be it real or imaginatively concocted, it nonetheless describes the idea of an issue thought to be a problem, and the definition of the problem is subjected to conventional ideas that may be totally, or at least partially incorrect for your circumstances.
Whomever the idea of a "problem" is directed towards, neither you nor your child (for example) are experiencing any conventional form of "intoxication" (broadly defined) or disease, etc., that would readily explain a change in behavior and/or feelings of being different than others. There is nothing obvious to you that would explain the behavior such as having sprouted wings, or your brain doubled in size; which could be used as some externally visible indicator to explain a perceived change or difference, and aid with both the interpretation and labeling... whether good, bad, harmful or negligible. If there is nothing external to pin point, then it is the convention to exercise the dichotomy of thought and consider that there must must be an internal cause/reason. Yes, one turns inward and may, in some cases, advance to the centrality of suicidal ideation. Otherwise, some other coping mechanism may be tried including a change in jobs, partnership, residence, school... or anything else one might think of to remove themselves or a loved one from some supposed external form of a bad influence. However, many people automatically think the supposed problem lays within themselves... that there is something wrong with them and in their view, there is no readily discernible means of dealing with the situation other than by adopting some socially acceptable coping mechanism which offers an excuse. For whatever reason(s) they almost automatically interpret themselves as being the originating source of the problem. Yet, this so-called problem they are experiencing is being experienced on an individual basis by multiple others all over the world in different cultures. And each culture has devised labels and methods to deal with their diagnosis and some step-wise fashion of addressing the presumed problem so as to get the person to accept the rule-of-thumb intervention to get the person back on the path of some expected normalcy.
Your problem, contoured by the language you speak in a given culture and occupation along with education and personal experiences; is a shared event that the world as a whole remains oblivious to, with respect to the overall circumstances of individualized behavioral problems having a global connectivity. So let me use capital letters to represent a heightened vocalization of my opinion involving the need for a different attitude and globally adopted education approach devoid of any current institutionalize explanation. In other words, the application of a different world-view involving trichotomization can not be applied in terms of any religion, politics, or cultural inclination of social control of thought along traditional venues:
THE "PROBLEM" IS THAT HUMANITY IS EXPERIENCING A DEVELOPMENTAL SHIFT IN HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS, and most people are not aware of this, leaving us to seek out directional assistance from otherwise compassionate interventionists whose abilities serve a type of training that could provide assistance if the tools of their given trade included personal experiences and knowledge of the developmental shift by way of Trichotomization. Whereas some instructors of basic counting in grade/primary schools permit their students to count their fingers, citing some anthropological appropriateness, the same technique can be used to direct world-view orientations, but to do so requires a cadre of adult teachers to forego the use of any culturally associated tradition of interpretation and labeling, as it now does in the various instructional methodologies involving dualities.
I think there are millions of people who have/are experienced/ing subtle and/or not so subtle transitions in consciousness. And this can happen at any age to anyone in any culture. Some people have their sensibilities overwhelmed, resulting in what are described as "problems" of one sort or another, while others interpret their respective change in consciousness as a revelatory experience if they are religious, or otherwise interpret it according to a given even when they are experiencing a change, such as if they are inebriated, and thus define the change as being due to alcohol, a drug, sexual activity, maturity, training at a job, learning at school, etc... Whatever context one is in during an acknowledged change, that may be how and why they define the change as either a welcomed growth or as a disturbance of routinized thought processing.
For some, a change in consciousness may be as disturbing as when one thinks they have seen a UFO or alien/extra-terrestrial, ghost, demon or spiritual figure. While others have trained themselves not to over-react to new experiences and allow themselves an abundance of time for reflection and non-superstitious interpretation... nor self-indulgent uplifting ego claims. On many occasions a person's experiences may be taken in stride, while others around them have difficulty adjusting to another's development and seek to force them to retain some earlier version of themselves by claiming there is a problem, and are effective in getting others to go along with their assessment. Conspiratorial activities are not confined to governments, religions or work-places. They occur on playgrounds, school rooms, households, gangs, teams, clubs, restaurants, movie theaters, shared vehicle rides, etc...
In an effort to get humanity to pursue a course which not only allows for the global presence of a developmental change in consciousness, but introduces a necessary conceptual framework to be incorporated into the various methodologies different cultures employ for instructing their given populations, let me provide a simplified rule-of-thumb:
- lst, it must be acknowledged that a survey of biological development routinely proceeds along a 1-2-3 maturational development sequence.
- 2nd, it must be acknowledged that present instruction methodologies use a traditional currency of advocating a world-view of dichotomization.
- 3rd, it must be acknowledged there is a need for advancing a model of instructing the mind of humans to learn how to count ideologically.
Whereas the currency of teaching children is to focus their attention to grasping both Cardinality (1,2,3...) and Ordinality (1st,2nd,3rd...) in the domain of Arithmetic to later be applied to more complex thinking called Mathematics, yet the larger mental activity of developing a world-view involving the conceptual framework of different subjects, is not being provided a similar avenue of logical structuring. This is left up to the dominant social influence of a given culture, be it religious indoctrination, political mandates, business employments, tradition, Fairy tale or advertising imposed life direction and meaning, etc...
We as a species, particularly as a global collection of tradition-sustaining cultures, institutions, and overlapping commerce, do not have an appreciable grasp of a developmental human consciousness expressing itself with differences in world-view orientations which are measurable and can occur with anyone anywhere, young or old. To understand this, is to be cognizant of the fact that for the most part, human consciousness has relied on the usage of viewing the world in various models of the ancient Yin/Yang compilation, resulting in a practiced Persistent Dichotomization, alternatively described as duality, dyad, binary, etc... It is this model of perception which major institutions utilize as a standard of orientation, albeit with the vocabulary consistent with a given culture, education setting, livelihood, and adherence to ideological practices of former eras. In other words, one group of people may routinely use words such as pairs, doubles, couple, etc., while another group uses words such as binary, dichotomization, divestment, etc...
Institutions of higher (and lower) learning have an expectation for students to become versed in the use of perceptual tools advancing a given dualistic orientation, though some institutions such as religion use cross-cultural conventions of duality such as heaven/hell, right/wrong, good/evil, sacred/profane, etc... The same goes for psychology, philosophy, mathematics, politics, war, commerce, sports, law, etc... Such systems are enforced and imposed on the human psyche as expressions of rationality, normalcy, and above all, orientations of accepted sanity which are commonly abused by leaderships to effect some measure of individual or group control.
The world-wide standard of using dichotomies as the foremost means by which a person is to orient themselves in the practiced reality from one era to the next, does not permit the average person to transition smoothly into a realm of perception created by a developmental shift that I am labeling a third consciousness based on evidence culled from multiple subjects... but in particular, developmental biology. Many people are struggling with their own model of transition which can waver between the second and third consciousness, though some may experience overwhelming measures of an episodic nature for which there are no standard methods of accommodation, because the world's professionals who are typically in a position to assist in the transition, are not even aware that such a developmental circumstance even exists... and that their own experiences of the shift have been misunderstood because of training that was and remains too deeply steeped in the use of dichotomies and remain appreciably ignorant of humanity's potential shift in a consciousness more fully geared for a world-view in which trichotomization exists.
So, what's your problem? If you seek out assistance from a theologian, they are limited in their understanding of trichotomization relevant to the ideas constrained by their religious doctrine, and yet you are a person who has experienced more and read more widely in multiple subjects. In moat cases, well-meaning religious counselors can only reveal to you their level of ignorance and try to impress upon you the importance of accepting their ignorance as the way to some purported salvation, though your god has seen fit to provide you with a greater curiosity and much larger IQ then all of your previous go-to theologians put together. The same goes for your school counselors, family doctors, psychologists, and otherwise intelligent sounding business people... all of whom have very narrow, very selective, though astute knowledge base of their singular pre- and post-occupation.
Go ahead and ask the otherwise sincere, compassionate and well-meaning intelligent people what they know about a developmental shift in human consciousness and the role trichotomization plays. Whoops, wait a minute. You just mentioned an idea and word that is not part of their knowledge base. And if you or they seek to find out more by a survey of internet available answers, you either come up with some profound idiocy, or nothing at all, even though the current state of AI is just as muddled headed as are known-it-all pretentious humans and will make something up from a composite of bits and pieces of information culled from millions of sources that do not have a conceptual framework of what is being discussed on this page.
Now that you know your so-called "problem" or that of another is the expression of a developmental shift in consciousness, who are you going to talk with? Some adherent of a New Age conjecture about a higher consciousness? Or how about some Buddhist, or Hinduist, or Christian, or Moslem, or Jew? While most are very nice, well-mannered, polite, kind, and perhaps divinely astute, They do not have an appreciable grasp of the idea about a developmental trend in human consciousness which their world-views are ignorant of... but are nonetheless inclined to interpret their ignorance as a type of adopted humility to their overall metaphysical explanation of life and reality.
In short, you may not find answers to your particular venue of a developing consciousness from anyone in your immediate social sphere, nor even on the internet in any conventional sense of professional assistance. No less, if you are interpreting your particular developmental shift in conjunction with some conventional orientation (money, property, sex, religious salvation, housing, clothes, transportation, etc...), then you are misunderstanding the developmental shift in terms of the overall species; and think of it in terms of some developing super-natural ability. While you indeed may acquire multiple IQ points, you may not have the necessary vocabulary or knowledge that is readily applicable to the circumstances you are currently experiencing. Just because you sprout wings overnight, doesn't mean you will be able to use them to fly if the circumstances you are in is little different than a cage. Much like monks in the past who cloistered themselves away so as to share in the like-mindedness of others who spoke in terms of metaphysical ideas lofted into some would-be over-seeing god; yet never realizing their neurotic suppositions would become occupied by vast populations whose developing consciousness did not permit individual creations of purposeful thought. The once enclave of neurotics allowing themselves an opportunity for their consciousness to develop, created an external world filled with psychotics still adhering to the out-dated beliefs.
Page initially created: Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025... 9:54 AM
Initial posting: Sunday, July 6th, 2025... 11:12 AM