Threesology Research Journal
The Nature of Threes according to Humanity...2

A Study of the Threes Phenomena

Nature of 3s... 1 Nature of 3s... 2 Nature of 3s... 3 Nature of 3s... 4

Flag Counter
Viewers since August 9th, 2025

Interestingly, if you emphasize the presence of some recurring geometry and then associate some numerical value afterwards, this is viewed as a different type of cognitive behavior then if you emphasize the presence of some enumeration to which you afterwards associate some geometry. The former is complimentarily labeled creative thinking and the latter disparaged as an exercise in Numerology. And if point out a repeating succession of enumeration with different numbers discovered by someone whose name and title of Mathematician has been attached to the lineage such as the Fibonacci sequence, it is someone all the more important than if numerous non-mathematicious people point out the successive repetition of a single number such as 1, or 2, or 3... etc... Indeed, there is an active prejudice, discrimination and bias at work not only in the field of Mathematics, but those who have convinced themselves that the tool of mathematics as they understand and use it, is made all the more important and interesting if they engage in the adoption of a given prejudice, bias, and discrimination. Let us therefore spit on their hypocrisy, arrogance and clannish self-indulgence.

Had I been taught to enlist the utility of such a (threes) perspective tool in school, it would have made a great difference to my ability to survey reality in a rational way, despite the negative associations frequently enlisted by several professions who give knee jerk, copycat reactions to anyone who practices a typical collectivity of some enumeration with which they commonly attempt to use as a means of implementing some financial gain. However, if you do collect examples of some enumeration and do so by applying some non-typical grade school number label such as "Pentadactyl" or Quaternary, Dyad, tithing, bicycle, etc. In other words, if you adopt a different vocabulary of enumeration than that typically used in grammar school where learning to count one's fingers is sometimes permitted and instead use the vocabulary of enumeration applied in activities exercised by labeled professionals in scientific or mathematical fields; your collection of enumeration is somehow transformed into something to be respected because it has acquired some measure of sophistication, much in the manner that instead of saying:

  • Someone is a janitor or garbage man you label them as a waste manager or sanitation engineer.
  • Or instead of a warehouse worker you give them the title of material handling proficiency expert.
  • Or after donning a police uniform an ordinary person is somehow magically transformed into a Sociologist, skilled negotiator, wise counselor, or whatever expertise is required for a given encounter with the public.
  • Or instead of calling a battlefield a government-sanctioned killing zone of murder, rape, and mayhem, you label it a theater with good and bad actors.
  • Or instead of pronouncing the irrationalities of war's madness, you produce operational procedures called the Geneva Convention in order to conceal hypocrisy behind a cloak of pretended justice, dignity, and magnanimity... because there is an accepted rationale that war is inevitable.
  • Or instead of calling someone who plays with numbers put into equations a skilled Numerologist, you label them a Mathematician.
  • Or labeling someone a biologist instead of pointing out they have an obsession with describing the sexual activity of different life forms.
  • Or let's call someone an exercise trainer instead of a passive sex fiend trying to maneuver and ingratiate themselves into a potential position of sexual activity.
  • Or lets call someone a politician instead of the scum sucking, back stabbing, self-aggrandizing dirt bag some of them are in their misuse of public trust and money.
  • Or let's call them a successful business person for having not gotten caught stealing.
  • Or let's call them a great General for sending thousands of naive recruits to their death all in the name of some foolish patriotism defined by politicians serving the interests of their campaign contributors.
  • Or let us call it a National Memorial service or National Holiday protected, insured, and enforced by a government or religion as a means of forcing a public to collectively remember because otherwise it has a very short memory, thereby allowing one idiot to follow on the heels of another idiot in an election.
  • Or... I am sure the reader can add to this list.
  • Psychologists calling it an obsessive/compulsive activity... or
  • Mathematicians calling it Numerology... or
  • Theologians trying to claim ownership by labeling it a sacred number...or
  • Philosophers describing it as one of multiple pluralities... or
  • Anthropologists appending the notion of cultural specificity...

With so much negativity asserted by standing professionals in multiple disciplines, it is clear we are being confronted by an ages-old dichotomous model of irrationality that was widely deemed as natural and normal in past eras, though different peoples expressed their list of duality-based perceptions in ways relative to the culture's language(s) and mode of expression, whether recorded or not. For example, while the ancient Chinese made a list of dualities called the Yin and Yang (principles), other cultures used statuary such as the twin gods motif, double-faced Janis, religious dualities, oppositional conflicts, etc...

Google AI response to the query "ancient cultures originated by twins":

Many ancient cultures feature prominent myths and traditions centered around twins, often embodying dualistic concepts, representing creation, or even founding cities. These myths often depict twins as divine beings, heroes, or founders of civilizations, highlighting the cultural significance of twin births in various societies.

Here are some examples:
  1. Roman Mythology: The story of Romulus and Remus, the twin brothers who founded Rome, is a classic example. They were famously suckled by a she-wolf and their story is deeply ingrained in Roman identity.
  2. Greek Mythology: The Dioscuri, Castor and Pollux, are twin brothers, with Castor being mortal and Pollux immortal. They are associated with horsemanship and were revered as protectors. Also, Apollo and Artemis, twin deities associated with the sun and moon respectively, play significant roles in Greek mythology.
  3. Maya Mythology: The Hero Twins, Hunahpu and Xbalanque, are central figures in the Popol Vuh, the sacred narrative of the Maya people. They are depicted as overcoming trials and ultimately ascending to become the sun and moon.
  4. West African Cultures: In some West African societies, particularly among the Yoruba people, twins were revered as deities and were often represented by wooden statues called Ibeji. Conversely, other cultures, like the Igbo people, had traditions of killing twins due to negative beliefs.
  5. Norse Mythology: Odin and Vili (along with their brother Ve) are depicted as twins in Norse mythology, playing a crucial role in the creation of the world.

These examples demonstrate how twins have been interpreted and mythologized across various ancient cultures, often representing fundamental concepts like duality, creation, and the balance between opposing forces./p>

While the view that Twins in Mythology is widely accepted; an no doubt influenced by the occasional birth of twins (viewed as a miracle) was an event needing to be explained (and typically was in some metaphysical way); let us note that the later born perspective of reality consisted of a growing number of metaphysically derived triplet configurations commonly labeled triads or triunes. It also is of value to note that the concept of plurality and multiplicity are not distinct cognitive enumerations like dualities and triplicities. In other words, they represent primitive models of counting without identifying a distinct count value. Interestingly, there is not "Triplets in Mythology" page in the Wikipedia, despite separate entries for:

Triad (religion) Triple deity

It stands to reason that there would be multiple cognitive instances of duality in the past, with respect to a developmental sequence of consciousness... even if most people are not familiar with the notion of "Trichotomization." In fact, during the present era, you would be hard pressed to find any resources which discuss the idea of trichotomization in relation to the idea about the development of a 3rd consciousness... though multiple people have laluded to it with personalized orientations to some "third" idea or expression.

While this is not to say such a cognitive tool has not and does not afford some serviceable utility, since so much of civilization has been constructed by this basic pattern for which humanity has had to adopt and adapt to because of the multiple societal (business, government, religious) institutions and architectural configurations designed by this paradigmatic contour; but like those biological instances in which development has proceeded into a three-based factorial system (such as the triplet code in DNA and 1-2-3 developmental sequencing of the Three Germ Layers); it is a pronounced survival need for us to come to a more pronounced grasp and implementation of a trichotomous orientation where several attempts have been made by those seeking to expand upon dichotomous orientations such as:

  • The two-(cichotomous) based (Eastern) Yin/Yang was superseded by an attempt to devise a three-based ideological purview called triads in the I-Ching; but actually developed only embellished forms of dyads.
  • The two- (dichotomous) based (Western) Mathematics has made several attempts to develop Trichotomous-based ideological forays such as the One-Two-Many number succession theme of early counting efforts, Pythagorean theorem, Trigonometry, Boolean Algebra...
  • The two- (dichotomous) based (Western) Philosophical tradition has striven to complete its efforts into a fully established trichotomous orientation by way of such patterns as:
    • Monism- Dualism- Pluralism
    • Singles- Doubles- Multiplicity
    • One god- Paired gods- Plurality of gods/ Pantheon, 3 or more gods,
    • Monotheism, Ditheism, Polytheism
  • The two- (dichotomous) based orientations (good/evil, right/wrong, etc...) of religion have adopted segmentations of attempted trichtomization:
    • Christianity- patterns-of-three in the life of Jesus, Trinitarian 3 persons in 1 godhead theme.
    • Hinduism- Trimurti (Brahma- Visnu- Siva)
    • Islam... (Still references he antiquated and out-dated orientation towards patterns-of-seven).
    • Judaism... (Retains an antiquated orientation involving Numerology called the Kabbalah/Cabala).
  • The two- (dichotomous... binary) based formula of an electronic circuit defined language...
    • Attempts are being made to establish a trinary/ternary code for the next generation of computers called quantum computing.
Dichotomies/Dualities/Dyads... are routinely embellished
to give the appearance of a Triad/Trinity/Trichotomy.

Their persistence on using different formulations of dichotomy are exercised as part of a publicly taught curriculum of indoctrination (education, business, religion, politics...) that does not have an appreciably grasp of Trichotomization relevantly exposed by the multiplicity of examples we can bring to bear as evidence that humanity is undergoing a developmental shift in human consciousness.

Yet, why so much animosity against the cataloguing of ideas with a particular pattern, when such an exercise takes place in multiple areas of human interest such as being labeled the statistics of sporting activity where records are routinely kept and studied by way of a comparative analysis, just as stock market activities, disease recurrences, games of chance (gaming), bank accounts, etc.? One might think they do so, because they are scared that people will come to identify that their fundament natures are based on a lesser valuation representing a persistent use of dichotomies. Indeed, there tradition of persisting in a foundation of "twoness" does not bode well for someone's supposed "mental illness" if in reality it is a fledgling development along a course of "threes" which we may formalize with the term "Trichotomization". However, as already mentioned, not only is the current orientation of Psychology based on some valuation of "twoness", but Mathematics as well as (including metaphysics in western religion and Eastern philosophy) are headed along a path of disintegration teetering on the precipice of obsolescence because they refuse to adopt an enhanced appreciation of consciousness developing along a 1-2-3 developmental sequence— whose further development is constrained by the requirements of adaptation to an incrementally deteriorating planetary system; where the conformity of their present views are little more than childish rationalizations.

In viewing cognitive activity in its perception, explanation and categorization of reality from the vantage point of different subjects, one correlation that some readers may or may not be familiar with; though some may have developed the comparison on their own, is the similarities to be found with the human brain and the Universe. The following 1st image is a link to a video about the correlation. The 2nd image, taken from the video doesn't include the three matter/energies of the Universe (Dark energy- Dark matter- Ordinary matter), so I include all three with corresponding "threes" related to the brain/human body:

Compairing the brain to the Universe

Correlating the human brain with the Universe

Granted that both the human brain and Universe are evolving any may one day approximate a much closer resemblance, but for now the correlation is an interesting one that others have considered on their own, and welcome the youtube illustration describing "their idea" with more definitive information.

3 main fluids found in the human brain:

  1. Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF):
    1. Location: Found in the ventricles (hollow spaces within the brain), the subarachnoid space (between the protective membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord), and the central canal of the spinal cord.
    2. Function: Provides buoyancy, cushioning the brain and spinal cord, transports nutrients, removes waste products, and helps maintain a stable environment for brain cells.
    3. Production: Primarily produced by the choroid plexuses in the brain ventricles.
  2. Cerebral Blood:
    1. Location: Circulates throughout the brain's arteries and veins, delivering oxygen and nutrients.
    2. Function: Essential for supplying oxygen and glucose to brain cells and removing waste products.
    3. Regulation: Tightly regulated by the blood-brain barrier, which prevents free exchange of substances between blood and brain tissue.
  3. Interstitial Fluid (ISF):
    1. Location: Surrounds the cells (neurons and glia) within the brain tissue (parenchyma).
    2. Function: Provides the immediate environment for brain cells, facilitating exchange of water, ions, gases, and other molecules between cells and the blood vessels.
    3. Relationship to CSF: Interstitial fluid and CSF are closely related, with exchange occurring between them, especially in the perivascular spaces (spaces around blood vessels).

If we simply use the percentages of water, blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compared to the 3 percentages of Matter/Energy, we come up with the following chart, though the reader may prefer some differences in percentages:


Universe Human Brain
Dark energy - 68%
Dark matter - 27%
Ordinary matter - 5%		 Water - 73% to 85%
CSF - 10% of total intracranial content.
Blood - gray matter: 4-6%; white matter: 1-3%
[Universe percentages generated by using the query: "matter/energy percentages of the universe"]
[Brain percentages generated by using the query: "The brain has what percentage of water, blood and CSF?"]

Let me provide a short list of three-patterned ideas from Multiple sciences (Astronomy, Biology/Genetics, Physics, Mathematics...) and arrange them in according to how they may have come into existence, even though you may prefer some other arrangement. The order will nonetheless provide you with the central idea of chronology, despite my errors, because some think that there can be no Universe without some present day currency of fundamental particles and forces.

3 Universe geometries configured as a single entity

Humanity is like 3 blind wise men describing what they think they "see" is the shape of the Universe, much in the manner that the blind men tried describing an elephant from their individual vantage point.

3 possible designs to the Universe, which may be better viewed as a 3-in-1 construction, to the extent that though we devise the notion of 3 possible forms to the Universe, the 3 may actually be describing the same singularity from different vantage points being provided mathematical supportive evidence, because of the present type of flexibility inherent in a dichotomous-based mathematics being contoured ("tweaked") by humanity indulging in the toolage of rationalization, which overlooks the "3" and calls it a "4" instead of a 3-to-1 ratio, which is an idea that is much like an adjustable crescent wrench, applicable to multiple subjects of cognitive activity, Here is one version of a list, with yet another variation further on:

  • 3 (mathematically considered) Universe shapes: Flat, Spherical, Saddle-shaped (Linear-like, Circular-like, Triangular-like)
  • 3 spatial dimensions: length, width, height/depth... 1 time dimension
  • 3 fundamental forces which agree with the standard model of physics: Strong, Weak. Electro-magnetic; 1 non-agreeing force: Gravity
  • 3 families of fundamental particles:

AI generated list of 3 particle families 3 Elementary particles arranged in three columns

3 Masses of the Universe
  • 3 Universe Mass-Energies:
    • 68% Dark energy
    • 27% Dark matter
    • 5% Ordinary matter
  • 3 commonly referenced states of Matter: Solids, Liquids, Gases; 1 non-commonly referenced state of Matter: Plasma
  • 3 (Erwin Hubble) classifications of Galaxies based on their visual appearance, particularly their shape and structure:
    1. Spiral
    2. Elliptical
      • Lenticular galaxies are hybrids of Spiral and Elliptical forms
    3. Irregular
  • 3 Galaxy categories based on luminosity (called "Active"):
    1. Seyfert Galaxies (type I and type II); are most common with low energy.
    2. Quazars
    3. Blazars

Classifications of stars based on Quantity (Google search query: "single, double, "tripie" star clustering")

  1. Single Star System: Like our solar system, a single star system consists of a single star orbited by planets, debris disks, or other celestial bodies.
  2. Binary Star System: This system consists of two stars that orbit each other around a common center of mass. Binary systems are also known as physical double stars. [Most frequent)]
  3. Multiple star system (sometimes referenced as two or more instead of three or more):
    • Triple Star System (or Ternary/Trinary): A multiple star system with three stars is called a triple, ternary, or trinary system.
    • Quadruple Star System: Consists of four stars. (Star systems with four or more components are rare.)
    • Quintuple Star System: Contains five stars.
    • Sextuple Star System: Includes six stars.
    • Septuple Star System: Composed of seven stars.
    • Octuple Star System: Features eight stars.

Since many of us would agree that the development of the brain over time is connected with the idea labeled consciousness, when we see a similar developmental expression in multiple life forms exhibiting a pattern-of-three, it is not difficult to understand the possibility that there may well be an underlying environmentally influenced disposition to orient ourselves in reality by way of three-pattern ideas. However, this is not to say humanity can not be distracted by the use of other patterns nor that the human mind can not be met with stagnation seen repeating old cognitive orientations. Here is an image of different brains illustrating a three-based compilation:

Tripartite brain development of different life forms

Let us portray a scenario in which a child appears to be "out of sync" with their classmates, creating the need for the situation to be addressed. Let us assume that the child's "problem" is an unrecognized developmental orientation towards a three-based compartmentalization of perceptions. In other words, they (for whatever reason) have a brain that is developing into a model of trichotomization that is having to confront a society and teaching establishment which is mostly focused on the usage of basic dichotomies with no established teaching methodology for both recognizing and being sensitively aware that human consciousness, based on a recurring threes patterning found in biology and anatomy, can crop up more poignantly in some students than others. What the child is confronted with is teachers, administrators, counselors, psychologists, a police force, and even home life... that dominantly focuses on the usage of dichotomies while being oblivious to the presence of a growing perspective of Trichotomization.

In order to appreciate what a child is confronted with by so-called intelligent professionals, is to take stock of a dominant usage of trichotomization as illustrated by several examples on this page: Persistence of Dichotomies. Who does the child turn to if their mind is developing towards a predominant three-patterned orientation... when the standard among professionals is to use a foundation of dichotomies that does not include a perspective of developmental trichotomization? In addition, when we observe that in some cases their is an attempt by users of dichotomies to move beyond them and pursue some measure of trichotomization, they nonetheless remain sensitively unaware that the whole of such is an example of a developmental shift in human consciousness that society as a whole remains appreciably ignorant of. Whereas there may be an attempt to pursue that to be recognized beyond a "2" formula, but the attempt is a transitional one... whereby the effort is more of an embellished dichotomy and not an actually achieved trichotomy. For example:

  • The old Yin/Yang list of dichotomies was followed by an attempted trichotomization called I-Ching trigrams, but on closer examination we see embellished byads/dyads: A true trigram would display a one, two, three-line configuration and not repeat the one or two-lines in a three-pattern way. The Trigrams still conform to the old Yin/Yang philosophy where the single line symbolically represents the male penis and the double line symbolically represents the female vagina.

Embellished byads in the I_Ching

  • in Mathematics we see manifested triadic structures and ideas, many of which are little more than embellished dualities, posed as adjuncts to philosophical syllogisms (that I prefer to call sillygisms:
    • Pythagorean theorm (A2 + B2 + C2
    • Trigonometry (Sine- Cosine- Tangent)
    • Boolean Algebra (AND, OR, NOT gates used in Binary computer language)
  • Binary Computer Language (based on the on/off electrical circuit)
    • Present efforts are under way to develop a Quantum Computer featuring a ternary/trinary language.
  • Psychology/Sociology: (notice some use two names for themselves while other authors may include a middle initial as a third name reference)
  • Religion/Mythology- Many of the triads of the past (primarily described as such by us of the present), were representative of an "upper limit consciousness" expressed in metaphysical terms, while the basic formula of orientation in the world required an active mindset of dualities: (good/bad-evil, right/wrong, strong/weak, slave/master, rich/poor, faithful/infidel, etc...). Triads are used to illustrate some higher or highest position of human conceptual consideration. Triads were expressed formulas illustration some notion of thought-to-exist possibility.

    • We can see a similar transitional orientation in psychology such as the use of "threes" in psychological theories:

  • Philosophy: (A short list follows...)


Short list of philsophers using a pattern-of-three

3-part Logic

Thesis ~ Antithesis ~ Synthesis
Indulgence  ~ "Middle Way" ~ Ascetism
Major Premise  ~ Minor Premise ~ Conclusion
Contradiction ~  Excluded  Middle ~ Identity Principal
"God-ology":
Omnipresent
Omnipotent
Omniscient		 "Metaphysics-ology":
What is real
How change comes
What is mind		 Marxian "Dialectology":
Unity of opposites
Quantity & quality
Negation of negation
Epistemology:
How we know
What is truth
What is mind		 Axiology:
Nature of good
Nature of beautiful
Nature of religious		 Ontology:
Quality (1st-ness)
Relation (2nd-ness)
Representation (3rd-ness)


  • 3 times the fool: You can fool some people some of the time - Some people all the time - But not all people all the time.
  • 3 traditional syllogism forms: Categorical - Hypothetical - Disjunctive
  • 3-patterned basic adult syllogism: All ravens are black - Jack is a raven - Therefore, Jack is black.
  • 3-patterned basic child syllogism: Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear - Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair - Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't fuzzy was he?
Date of Origination: Sunday, May 31st, 2025... 11:21 PM
Initial Posting Date: Saturday, August 9th, 2025... 1:19 AM