Believability of Threesology
A Study of Repeating 3s
Visitors as of 9/19/2025
It's fun playing the Devil's advocate with one's own research. At present, I queried the internet about the accuracy of the Threesology.org site. In summation, the AI of my query doesn't favor the site as being an authentic source of information. As such, I also need to query what the Meaning of "Academically Correct", and make a note of those ideas in the past which were rejected by professionals and yet went on to be valid practices in the future. In short, it seems that the information at the Threesology site is inaccurate because it does not adhere to the rules of present day academics. Shame on me for not believing as the professionals do. Shame on me for not toeing the line with respect to giving way to accepted theories and ideas that others use to make money off of when writing books. I am a terrible person for citing articles from the Britannica and other sources with academically recognized leaders in a given field of study. Heaven forbid I use information from the Wikipedia and other scholarly recognized sources. How dare I come up with ideas not governed by rules and regulations others do... and yet if they come up with a similar idea they are rewarded by being cited as a creative thinker. Heaven forbid someone not in the Academic arena comes up with a brilliant idea, since brilliant ideas have to be peer reviewed to acceptable standards whereby others can get a piece of the action... like the government permitting the sale of lottery tickets, guns, liquor and other items once deemed illegal, when it was enabled to get a portion of the gains through taxes. Throughout History we can find professionals expressing ignorance, jealousy and discrimination, such as for example, when the idea of an affliction called "Bicycle Face" took the public stage when woman were finding some measure of emancipation by riding bicycles.
Origination: Thursday, August 27th, 8:42 AM
Date of initial posting: Thursday, August 27th, 9:18 AM