(Basic Geometry of Cognitive Activity)
[1 point- 2 points- 3 points]
| RSP 1 | RSP 2 | RSP 3 | RSP 4 | RSP 5 | RSP 6 | RSP 7 |
Lookiloos as of August 4th, 2025
Interestingly, this foregoing system of logic doesn't describe how a theorem is to be viewed as a truth based on the foundation of an Axiom which is not proved. How can Theorems derived from proofless Axioms automatically be considered true? This is like two wrongs automatically creating a right, unless a theorem is to be as a direct opposite. Yet, its the narrative of a network of proofless claims asserted as a fact and the label of "factness" is enough to justify labeling the occasion as a type of chemical equation: Axiom → Theorem → X believability = proof.
While the above list of "reasons" may appear to be logical, one needs to first flip them upside down in order to visualize them as rungs on a step ladder. Very often we find energy expenditure (called effort) the defining attribute which persuades one to believe. Yet, even though multiple students "see through" the ideas of geometry as being made up, they are not permitted to sustain their disbelief to the point of dropping out of this kind of make-believe course of study. They are forced to believe it is real and represents a solid foundation for more advanced levels of believing in make-believe constructs called advanced or higher or pure mathematics, most of which has no real-world application but serves to bolster the nonsense of those who have convinced others to sponsor their search for ever greater expressions of symbolic nonsense labeled as truth, that becomes attached with whatever label is used by whatever subject of make-believe they are forced to accept in order to get a degree and perhaps some measure of high paying employment based on how well they too can persuade others to believe in the make-believe ideas. Just because Geometry is make-believe doesn't mean you can disbelieve to the extent of dropping the course of study if it is expected of you to pass as a requirement for how well you are gullible in believing other make-believe subject matter... supported by other believers of the same make-believe narratives of reality, be it religion, political science, business, city planning, architectural design, music, art, etc...
You may very well be ostracized by others if you can't convince them into believing you believe in their nonsense.. which is a common characteristic of one U.S. Presidential staff in office as opposed to another taking over after the term is ended. One layer of political nonsense after another.
Even though all present day religions are a joke just as are all systems of government, etc..., these are the standard delusions and hallucinations many people are accepting and striving to find some purposeful niche in so that they can acquire some semblance of sustainable survivability. But not only does one have to navigate through streams of practice nonsense, but also the many flavors of distraction, delusion, defeatism, etc., being perpetrated by a public trying to keep their held above the ever-increasing financial morass of flesh-consuming sewage while also maintaining a low profile of hiding in plain sight by assuming some measure of normalcy their mindset has created. Dodging the self-defeating coping mechanisms of others who may well gravitate towards a like-minded suite of actors and actresses that create self-opportunistic themes with attendant scripts and scenery, under some guise of open-armed acceptance of different players on a world stage which is rotting beneath everyone's feet and the wealthy are sacrificing the majority to spend more and more time in the raging waters of the very sewage they created but deny and let others test the waters of for their self-centered well-being.
Not only is one being pushed to swim to a non-existent shore given different names by different associations (religion: heaven; government: democracy; commerce: financial security; education: marketable knowledge, Buddhism: Enlightenment; etc... Every generation, every era, every species has its own measure of subnormal/abnormal, normalcy/common sense sanity, and believed in supremacy, superiority, genius, wisdom, etc...) And so let us ask, which of the three worlds do you live in during your time period? One more than the others? A proportion of two or a common-place indulgence of all three?
Permit me to list a few examples, whether you want to agree with them or not, because your first reaction is to identify some idea which you have esteemed as having no equal... thus revealing your ego gets in the way of seeing basic commonalities due to developed prejudices and discriminations. The following examples portray correspondences without any detailed explanation as they come to mind as basic correlations. The list profiles using 1, 2, or 3-part references, whereas on the next page in this series, the tripartite listings use multiple words as would be expected in providing extended explanations":
| Tripartite Cognitive Parallel Strategies: | |||
| Game elements: | Rock | Scissors | Paper |
| Geometry: | Point | Line (path) | Plane |
| Primitive Human Counting: | "1" | "2" | "Many" |
| Primitive Nature Counting A: | 1st layer Endoderm "Monoploblastic" Sponges |
2nd layer Ectoderm Diploblastic Cniderians |
3rd layer Mesoderm Triploblastic Worms → Humans |
| Including the Neural crest (derived from the ectoderm), we have 3 primary and 1 addition. (3-to-1 ratio?) |
|||
| Primitive Nature Counting B: | 1-stranded RNA | 2-stranded DNA | 3-stranded Collagen |
| 3-to-1 ratio of proteins: Primary structure is bead-like, 2ndary-3rdary-4thdary are "ribbonoid". | |||
| 3 Brain Vesicles: | Forebrain (Prosencephalon) |
Midbrain (Mesencephalon) |
Hindbrain (Rhombencephalon) |
| Utensils: | Knife (1) | Fork (2) | Spoon (3) (much/many/heap) |
| 3 Dimensions: | 1D | 2D | 3D |
| (Adding the dimension of time creates a 3-to-1 ratio: 3 spatial and 1 time dimension.) | |||
| Awareness: | Sub-conscious | Conscious | Super-conscious |
| 3 Dumezilian overlaps: | Priestly class | Warrior class | Commoner class |
| 3 Medieval Guild ranks: | Master | Journeyman | Apprentice |
| 3 Retail Business ranks: | Manager | Assistant Manager | 3rd Man (2nd Asst. Mgr.) |
| Cultural Reality: | Insanity | Sanity | Super-sanity |
| Socio-Economics: | Lower class Poverty |
Middle class Making ends meet |
Upper classRich-Richer-Richest |
| Personal Reality: | Madness Mediocrity |
Eccentric Creative |
Genius Originality |
| Humanness: | Sub-human | Human | Super-human |
| Engineering: | Lever | Fulcrum | Load |
| 3 Armageddons: | Extra-terrestrial Aliens, Asteroids, etc... |
Human made Atomic, Biological, Chemical, etc... |
Religion made cataclysm/rebirth |
| Freudian personality: | ID | EGO | Super-EGO |
| Universe Content: | Visible matter (5%) | Dark matter (27%) | Dark energy (69%) |
| Fertilizer Content: | Nitrogen | phosphorus (phosphate) |
Potassium (potash) |
| Macromolecules: | RNA 1-stranded | DNA 2-stranded | Proteins 3-stranded |
| Cellular energy: | Adenosine Monophosphate A -Mono- P |
Adenosine Diphosphate A -Di- P |
Adenosine Triphosphate A -Tri- P |
| Religion: | Allah God Truth |
Mohammed Jesus Way |
Paradise Heaven Life |
| Buddhism: | Meditative Staging | I.M.V. paths | Enlightenment |
| Philosophy: | Monism | Dualism | Pluralism |
| Nature: | Unnatural | Natural | Super-Natural |
| Punctuation: | Period | Question mark | Exclamation point |
| Traffic light: | Red | Yellow | Green |
| 3 Eye Cones: | Red | Blue | Green |
| Military: | Enemy | Logistics | Battlefield(s) |
| Particle Physics: | 3rd family (highly unstable) |
2nd family (unstable) |
1st family (stable) |
With respect to the last example, it may be of value for some readers to look a bit more closely at this 3-part division in particle physics. I used the internet query "1st, 2nd, 3rd family particles":
There are of course several tripartite examples which involve internalized dichotomies such as the father-mother-child trio and the child/parents, child/mother, child/father, child/sibling relationship dynamic. In Evolutionary Biology from the perspective of Cladistics, we can see another tripartite-derived assessment of derivation related to "family groupings" labeled Mono-phyletic, Para-phyletic, Poly-phyletic:
However, the reader should not overlook the arrangement of ideas being illustrated to a particular naming convention that may not portray a 1-2-3 sequencing which can effect some cultural, subject, academic, or group-specific ordination. For example, while the foregoing image displays the concepts in an identifiable 1- 2- 3/many sequence, the following image displays the same ideas in a 1- 3/many- 2 lineup:
Most readers are dismissive of the arrangement of ideas, possibly claiming it to be the preference of a given author, and not question the different arrangements as representing cognitive flows... much like a Freudian slip of the tongue. It is similar to the line up of how one arranges the date as month, day, year or day-year-month, etc... It is like we are witnessing a kind of under recognized cognitive game being playing out in different subjects and contexts that can hamper or assist in communication of interpretations. It is an order of operations with respect to cognitive activity more easily recognized when numerous examples of tripartite ideas are catalogued and assigned a value which can be placed into a sequence... along with comparisons of non-tripartite organized perceptions.
If we conceptualize the notion of a "mental cladistics" or "cladistics of the mind," it becomes obvious that collecting a few examples of triads from a specific topic like religion (ancient and/or otherwise), the data set is much too small. However, a given researcher may have their time and energy solely or mostly focused on religion because of emotional attachments reinforced by cultural or subject-interest standards in order to be rewarded a University degree with which to gain a living and position to esteem themselves with. Similarly, attaching a particularized set of definitions to a particularized set of words also limits the data set by which an enlarged comprehension is to be ascertained for a clearer picture of an enlarged appreciation of human cognitive flow patterns that are easily seen as flow patterns already recognized in a present day model of physics which has not developed a publicly recognized analogy between itself and cognitive behavior.
The cognitive stream as related to wave and fluid dynamics has been mislabeled as "quantum" physics, where "quantum" refers to "many" and this 'many' item is the 3rd position in a tripartite configuration where human ego often gets in the way and asserts assumptions for something beyond tripartition involving a heuristic of repeating algorithms like concentric waves in a closed pond of information or a forced increased in size but then superstitiously arranging more information within self-defeating categories. Hence, to say "quantum" mechanics (thinking oneself has operationally permitted themselves to be open minded) is to recite the 3rd label in a flow of thought that overlooks two corresponding affiliations of consideration harboring the 1st and 2nd positions. Hence, the "shell" idea of particle position of energy states is a metaphor for illustrating rudimentary attempts to unravel the cognitive flow patterns as they are developing in an Evolutionary sense of interactive dynamics. To recognize the existence of a 3-family categorization of elementary particles and then to deny it as being representative of a larger cognitive stream of activity, is straight-jacketing one's imaginative potentiality. Just as we look back upon the ideas of ancient times as being naive or even stupid, such is the case for all the ideas today.
Page initially created: Sunday, July 20th, 2025... 4:44 AM
Initial posting: Monday, Aug. 4th, 2025... 8:08 AM