Threesology Research Journal
Tripartite Aspects of Various Subjects 4



Aspects 1 Aspects 2 Aspects 3 Aspects 4


Flag Counter
Visitors as of Sept. 3rd, 2025

On this page in order of appearance:

  • Tripartite Aspects of Communism, Democracy, Socialism: [1]
  • Tripartite Aspects of Diplomacy: [2]
  • Tripartite Aspects of Evolution: [3]
  • Tripartite Aspects of Stephen J. gould's Theories of Evolution: [4]
  • Recurring Tripartite Aspects of Existence: [5]
  • Recurring Tripartite Aspects of Reality: [6]
  • Recurring tripartite aspects of the Universe: [7]

For the first selection, I want to point out some simple correlations which may be of value to some readers:

  • Communism: requires the practiced participation of an insect colony mentality.
  • Democracy: requires the practiced participation of a mentality engaged in an equality of illusions and delusions supported by a collective system of rationalization. (i.e. "The Amgerican dream", "'Great' Britain", "Make America Great Again", "The Chosen People", "Manifest Destiny", "Super Power", "Gott Mit Uns": [Nazi- "God With Us"], etc...).
  • Socialism: requires the practiced participation of plagiarizing the mental utilities and vacuities of Communism and Democracy under its own brand name. (i.e. Social Democracy/Sociodemocracy, Social Communism/Sociocommunism, Social Darwinism/Sociodarwinism, Social Economics/Socioeconomics), Social Capitalism/Sociocapitalism, etc...)

A short look at the Military exhibits these three qualities of social theory into one amalgamation and thus can be viewed as a three-in-one trinity:

A Socialist, Communist military practice under the guise of a Democracy

[1] Internet query: "Tripartite Aspects of Communism, Democracy, Socialism"

AI (overview) response: For an explanation of the tripartite aspects of communism, democracy, and socialism, it is useful to compare them across three core aspects: economic structure, political structure, and the role of the individual. This comparison highlights how these systems define ownership, power, and individual rights differently.

1) Economic structure

This aspect addresses who owns the means of production—the factories, land, and resources used to create goods and services.
  • Communism
    • Aims for common ownership of the means of production. All property is owned communally, and there is no private property.
    • Employs a planned economy. A strong central government controls all aspects of economic production and distribution, managing prices, wages, and output.
    • Seeks to abolish class distinctions and compensate citizens based on their needs, not on their individual contributions.
  • Democracy
    • Often features a capitalist or mixed economy. In a capitalist system, the means of production are mostly privately owned, with prices and production set by supply and demand.
    • Incorporates elements of socialism in a mixed economy. Many democratic nations have public ownership of some essential services, such as utilities, alongside a dominant private sector.
    • Allows for private ownership and free markets, alongside potential regulations.
  • Socialism
    • Advocates for collective or state ownership of the means of production.
    • Varies in its approach to economic planning. Some socialist models retain market mechanisms (market socialism), while others rely on more centralized planning.
    • Seeks to redistribute wealth and achieve social and economic equality, often through a combination of social ownership, progressive taxation, and robust social welfare programs.

2) Political structure

This aspect addresses where political power lies and how it is exercised within each system.

  • Communism
    • In practice, has historically resulted in single-party, authoritarian rule. Communist parties wield a monopoly on political power and suppress dissent to enforce their control.
    • Uses revolution to achieve its goals. The transition from capitalism to communism is seen as requiring a violent overthrow of the existing social and political structure.
    • Theorizes the eventual "withering away" of the state once communism is fully achieved, leaving a stateless, classless society.
  • Democracy
    • Rests on the principle of popular sovereignty. Political power is derived from the consent of the governed, who participate in the political process. (H.O.B. note: Extremely limited participation, where the idea of incorporating a permanent jury-duty style of alternating participations in terms of a Cenocracy (New Goverment) is fully visible on the radar screens of millions, but very few acknowledge it viable utility if applied.)
    • Employs various forms, including representative democracy (citizens elect officials) and, in some cases, elements of direct democracy (citizens vote on policies). H.O.B.. note: public participation is often by way of a labyrinthine structure. Direct democracies have only been found to work with very small populations, because of the antiquated way in which votes are collected and tallied, as well as the questions posed to the public for their consideration.
    • Operates with fundamental principles such as free and fair elections, the rule of law, and the protection of minority rights. (H.O.B.. note: a "free" election would be in the absence of an Electoral college which subverts a true ruling of the majority.)
  • Socialism
    • Can be achieved through democratic means (democratic socialism). This approach seeks to implement socialist policies through parliamentary processes and winning elections within an existing democratic framework.
    • Can also take authoritarian forms, such as the state-controlled regimes historically associated with communism in the 20th century.
    • Maintains that democracy should expand to include economic decision-making, allowing for more direct participation by workers.
3) Role of the individual

This aspect describes the degree of individual autonomy versus collectivist interests within each system.

  • Communism
    • Subordinates the individual to the collective good. Individual liberties are often curtailed or ignored in favor of the interests of the state and the party.
    • In theory, aims for a community where individual needs are met by the group. In practice, this can lead to severe restrictions on personal freedom, expression, and religion.
    • Emphasizes collective cooperation over individual ambition to fulfill a planned production model.
  • Democracy
    • Upholds individual autonomy and rights. Democratic theory values the individual's right to control their own life within reason.
    • Protects fundamental freedoms, including freedom of speech, assembly, and the press.
    • Balancing collective and individual interests is a constant tension, but the system guarantees the right of individuals and minority groups to have their interests heard.
  • Socialism
    • Aspires to a balance between individual and social responsibility. While emphasizing the needs of the community, many forms of socialism still protect individual liberties and democratic processes.
    • The degree of individualism varies. A social democracy, for example, maintains many individual freedoms while using social programs to ensure a collective welfare safety net.
    • Seeks to foster creative expression by freeing individuals from the constraints of material scarcity and exploitative conditions.

[2] Internet query: "Tripartite Aspects of Diplomacy"

AI (overview) response: In diplomacy, the term "tripartite" does not refer to a single, universally accepted framework but to interactions involving three parties. The specific aspects of tripartite diplomacy vary depending on the context, but two prominent interpretations exist: the "triangular" dynamic in international relations and the "three pillars" approach to foreign policy

The triangular diplomacy dynamic

This concept focuses on managing the strategic relationship between three rival powers. It was developed by U.S. diplomat Henry Kissinger during the Cold War to manage relations between the United States, the Soviet Union, and China. The strategy works by leveraging the rivalry between two of the three powers to gain an advantage for the third, thus ensuring a balance of power. (H.O.B.. Note: It is a 3-divisions of government advancing a "checks and balances" rationale.)

The three pillars of foreign policy

This framework is used to structure a country's overall foreign policy efforts. A well-known example is the "Three D's" approach, which refers to Defense, Diplomacy, and Development.

  • Defense: This pillar involves a nation's military and security efforts to protect its interests and project power. It serves as a necessary backing for diplomatic efforts, as it can shape a country's negotiating leverage.
  • Diplomacy: This is the use of peaceful negotiations, communication, and relationship-building to advance national interests. It serves as the primary tool for resolving conflicts and fostering cooperation with other nations.
  • Development: This pillar includes foreign assistance, aid, and economic tools to promote stability and growth in other countries. By addressing the root causes of instability and creating economic partnerships, this approach can advance a nation's foreign policy goals.

Examples of tripartite diplomacy in practice

  • Trilateral cooperation: In 2025, China launched a new trilateral mechanism with Pakistan and Bangladesh to cooperate on trade, climate, and infrastructure projects.
  • Balancing great powers: Following the Cold War, a form of triangular diplomacy resurfaced in relations between the U.S., Russia, and China. An example is the 2001 Sino-Russian Treaty of Friendship, which served to counterbalance U.S. dominance.
  • The Axis powers in WWII: The 1940 Tripartite Pact between Germany, Italy, and Japan is a historical example of a three-way military alliance, often referred to as the Axis powers.
  • Response to the Ukraine crisis: In the context of the Russo-Ukrainian war, the diplomatic interactions between the U.S., the E.U., and Russia demonstrate a modern example of triangular diplomacy in action.

[3] Internet query: "Tripartite Aspects of Evolution"

AI (overview) response: Several concepts can be described as "tripartite aspects of evolution" depending on the biological scale, the driving forces, or the historical schools of thought involved. The most common interpretations refer to:

1) 1. The three primary levels of evolutionary change

This framework categorizes evolution by the scale at which it occurs, relating population-level changes to large-scale patterns observed over geological time.

  • Microevolution: Small-scale evolutionary change within a single population over a short period. It is directly observable and driven by mechanisms like natural selection, genetic drift, gene flow, and mutation.
  • Macroevolution: Large-scale evolutionary change that occurs at or above the species level over long periods. It involves speciation (the formation of new species), extinction, and the evolution of entire taxonomic groups. The accumulated effects of microevolution over immense spans of time drive it.
  • Megaevolution: An even larger-scale, rare, and rapid form of evolution that results in new classes or phyla, often following mass extinctions.

2) The three tiers of change, as proposed by Stephen Jay Gould

The paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould proposed a hierarchical view of evolution that recognized different processes acting at different levels of biological organization.

  • Tier 1: Population-level events. Changes occurring within species over ecological time, influenced by natural selection based on variations and adaptations to local environments.
  • Tier 2: Species selection. Evolutionary trends that persist over geological time and millions of years. This process involves the differential survival and reproduction of entire species, not just individuals within a population.
  • Tier 3: Mass extinction. Rare and rapid catastrophic events, such as the meteorite impact that killed the dinosaurs, that reset the course of life's history. Gould argued that these events are not simply an extension of regular processes and follow different rules.

3) The three driving forces of molecular evolution

In the field of molecular evolution, the factors that cause genetic variation and influence gene frequency in a population are described through a three-part model.

  • Selection: The non-random process where mutations that are beneficial to an organism's survival and reproduction are selected for, increasing their frequency in the population. Deleterious mutations are selected against and removed.
  • Neutral drift: The random, non-adaptive process where the frequency of a gene variant changes in a population due to chance events rather than fitness advantages. The neutral theory of molecular evolution suggests that many mutations are neutral and that most molecular-level changes are due to genetic drift.
  • Mutation and recombination: The raw sources of genetic variation. Mutations introduce new gene alleles into a population, and recombination shuffles those alleles into new combinations during reproduction. These processes provide the raw material for both selection and neutral drift to act upon.

4) The three components of the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis

The "Modern Synthesis," which developed in the 1930s and 1940s, integrated Darwinian evolution with Mendelian genetics. This cohesive framework was built on the work of multiple scientists and is based on three core ideas.

  • Mendelian inheritance: The genetic basis of variation, where traits are passed from parents to offspring as discrete units (genes) rather than blending.
  • Natural selection: The main guiding force of evolution, acting on the heritable variation within a population.
  • Population genetics: A mathematical framework for understanding how evolutionary forces like natural selection, mutation, and genetic drift affect the frequency of genes within populations.

[4] Internet query: "Tripartite Aspects of Stephen J. gould's Theories of Evolution"

AI (overview) response: Stephen J. Gould's theories of evolution are based on three major aspects, which he detailed in his magnum opus The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (2002). Gould argued that the modern synthesis of evolutionary theory had become too narrow and fixated on natural selection at the level of the individual. His tripartite framework expanded Darwinian theory with a broader, more pluralistic view of evolutionary mechanisms and patterns.

1) Punctuated equilibrium

In 1972, Gould and Niles Eldredge proposed the theory of punctuated equilibrium, which challenged the traditional view of phyletic gradualism–the idea that evolution proceeds at a slow and steady pace.

  • Stasis: Punctuated equilibrium posits that species spend most of their existence in a state of stasis, experiencing little or no evolutionary change.
  • Punctuation: These long periods of stability are "punctuated" by short, rapid bursts of speciation, particularly in small, geographically isolated populations.
  • Fossil record: This model provides an explanation for the common pattern in the fossil record, where new species often appear abruptly and remain unchanged for millions of years

2) Hierarchical selection

Gould expanded the idea of natural selection, traditionally focused on individual organisms, to argue that selection can act at multiple levels of a biological hierarchy.

  • Individual selection: Selection occurs at the level of the individual, with organisms with higher fitness producing more offspring.
  • Gene selection: Selection can act at the level of the gene, such as "selfish genes" that promote their own replication regardless of their effect on the organism's fitness.
  • Species selection: Gould proposed that selection also acts at the level of the species, where some species have properties that make them more likely to survive extinction and speciate. For example, a species with a broader geographic range may be more resistant to extinction. This process influences macro-evolutionary trends over long time periods.

3) Evolutionary contingency

In his book Wonderful Life (1989), Gould championed the role of historical contingency, arguing that the specific path of evolution is highly dependent on a series of unpredictable and chance historical events.

  • The "tape of life" thought experiment: To illustrate contingency, Gould proposed a thought experiment: "Replay the tape of life." He suggested that if we were to rewind evolution to a point like the Cambrian explosion and let it play again, the outcome would be radically different, and it is highly unlikely that anything resembling modern humans would evolve.
  • Historical accidents: Major evolutionary events, such as the mass extinction event that wiped out the dinosaurs, were historical accidents, not predetermined outcomes. The extinction created an opportunity for mammals to diversify and fill new ecological niches.
  • Critique of progress: Gould used the concept of contingency to argue against the idea that evolution is a predictable, progressive process leading to greater complexity or intelligence. The history of life is not a ladder of progress but a rich, branching bush influenced by unique events.

Please not in the following selection, there is a recurring issuance of human-based ideological themes and no presentation of examples from atomic physics, biology/genetics, geology and other subjects which should be included when the word "Existence" is used. The current values of the AI system have not been programmed to be this broad minded. Hence, we are stuck with redundant ides I have encountered elsewhere appearing in different queries:


[5] Internet query: "Recurring Tripartite Aspects of Existence"

AI (overview) response: Recurring tripartite aspects of existence appear in various human philosophical, religious, and psychological frameworks as a way of explaining reality, consciousness, or human nature. The consistent re-emergence of these divisions suggests a fundamental pattern in how humans perceive and organize their understanding of the world.

In philosophy and psychology

Plato's tripartite soul

In his work The Republic, the ancient Greek philosopher Plato proposed that the human soul consists of three parts:

  • The Rational Soul: This is the logical and truth-seeking part, which should govern the other two aspects. Its corresponding virtue is wisdom.
  • The Spirited Soul: The source of emotions such as anger and honor, this part is meant to be a natural ally to reason.
  • The Appetitive Soul: This part is driven by physical desires and instincts, such as hunger, thirst, and sex. It is the part of the soul most prone to excess and indulgence.

Freud's tripartite model of the psyche

In the early 20th century, Sigmund Freud proposed a model of the human psyche that bears a notable resemblance to Plato's:

  • Id: The instinctual, primal, and unconscious part of the mind that seeks immediate gratification. This is similar to Plato's appetitive soul.
  • Ego: The rational part of the mind that mediates between the desires of the id and the demands of the external world. It functions in a manner similar to Plato's rational soul.
  • Superego: The moral conscience that internalizes societal and parental standards. This function can be seen as an evolution of Plato's spirited soul.

MacLean's "Triune Brain"

Neuroscientist Paul MacLean's theory proposed that the human brain evolved in three distinct stages, with three layers still present and influencing human behavior.

  • Reptilian Complex: The oldest and most primitive part, this area governs basic survival instincts like fight-or-flight.
  • Limbic System: This middle layer is associated with emotions, motivation, and social behavior.
  • Neocortex: The newest and largest part of the brain, responsible for higher cognitive functions like reasoning, language, and abstract thought.

In theology and religion
The Holy Trinity

In Christianity, the doctrine of the Holy Trinity defines God as a single being existing in three distinct co-eternal persons: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit. While a logical paradox, this tripartite nature is a fundamental aspect of Christian theology and reality itself.

The tripartite nature of man

Some Christian theologians hold a "trichotomy" view, which divides human beings into three distinct parts, based on interpretations of verses like 1 Thessalonians 5:23.

  • Body: The physical and material component.
  • Soul: The psychological part, which includes the mind, will, and emotions.
  • Spirit: The part of a person that interacts with God and the spiritual realm.

The Three Characteristics of Existence (Buddhism)

In Buddhist philosophy, the three marks of existence are universal characteristics that define all phenomenal existence.

  • Anicca (impermanence): Everything is in a constant state of flux.
  • Dukkha (unsatisfactoriness or suffering): All conditioned phenomena are ultimately not completely satisfying.
  • Anatta (not-self): There is no fixed, permanent, or independent self or soul.

In metaphysics and spirituality
The divine triad (Sat-Chit-Ananda)

Some traditions within Hinduism and other spiritual systems describe the ultimate reality (Brahman) as having a triple nature.

  • Sat (existence): Being or pure existence.
  • Chit (consciousness): Awareness or pure consciousness.
  • Ananda (bliss): Joy or pure bliss.

These recurring tripartite structures across different domains of human thought suggest that dividing complex phenomena into three parts—such as mind, body, and spirit; reason, emotion, and appetite; or creation, preservation, and destruction—is a fundamental way in which humans attempt to understand the nature of being.

Please not in the following selection, like the one above there is a recurring issuance of human-based ideological themes and no presentation of examples from atomic physics, biology/genetics, geology and other subjects which should be included when the word "Existence" is used, though there is the added feature of speaking about the "cosmos", but not that there are three ideas concerning the shape of the Universe. The recurring values of the AI system exhibit a programming feature which illustrates how narrow minded the stated parameters are being used for inclusion of material, as well as a similar exclusionary formula... though the reader might want to argue the format of my queries are to blame. Nonetheless, there is a recurring reference to religion, mythology, and other metaphysical, supernatural, or thematic superstition.


[6] Internet query: "Recurring Tripartite Aspects of Reality"

AI (overview) response: Across history, philosophy, and religion, a tripartite (or three-part) model has been used to understand reality, humanity, and divinity. This recurring structure is used to explain complex concepts by dividing them into three distinct, yet interconnected, aspects.
Tripartite divisions of the cosmos

The most fundamental tripartite aspect of reality appears in many mythologies as the division of the cosmos into three realms:

  • Heaven, Earth, and Underworld: In ancient Greek mythology, the cosmos was divided among the three brothers:
    • Zeus ruled the heavens from Mount Olympus.
    • Poseidon ruled the seas (often associated with Earth's surface).
    • Hades ruled the underworld.
      • This structure is echoed in many other traditions, including Norse and ancient Egyptian myths.
  • The Tri-loka in Hinduism: This concept divides the universe into three worlds: heaven (svarga), earth (bhuloka), and the netherworld (patala).

Tripartite aspects of divinity H.O.B. note: While only the Christian Trinity is very often described as "3 persons in 1 godheae", it is not too difficult to ascertain this same meaning in multiple other ideas in and out of religion, to which I have referred to as 3-to-1 ratios.

Many religious traditions use a three-part model to describe the nature of a single divine being or a related group of three deities:

  • The Christian Trinity: The doctrine of the Trinity defines God as one being who exists as three coeternal and consubstantial divine "persons"—the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit.
  • The Hindu Trimurti: This concept personifies the cosmic functions of creation, preservation, and destruction as a triad of deities: Brahma (the creator), Vishnu (the preserver), and Shiva (the destroyer). The three deities are often viewed as different forms of the ultimate reality, Brahman.
  • The Triple Goddess in Neopaganism: Heavily influenced by the work of Robert Graves, this archetype represents the three primary stages of a woman's life as three aspects of a goddess: the Maiden, the Mother, and the Crone. These aspects are often associated with the waxing, full, and waning phases of the moon.

Tripartite aspects of the human soul and psyche

Thinkers have also applied a three-part structure to understand the human mind and soul:

  • Plato's Tripartite Soul: The ancient Greek philosopher Plato divided the soul (psyche) into three parts, which he illustrated using the "chariot allegory".
    • Logistikon (Reason): Located in the head, this part is responsible for rational thought and governing the other two parts.
    • Thymoeides (Spirit): Located in the chest, this part is the source of spirited emotions like courage and anger.
    • Epithumetikon (Appetite): Located in the stomach, this is the seat of desires for physical pleasures.
  • Freud's Id, Ego, and Superego: The father of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud, created a tripartite model of the human psyche.
    • Id: The primitive and instinctual part of the mind that contains sexual and aggressive drives and hidden memories.
    • Ego: The realistic part that mediates between the desires of the id and the moral constraints of the superego.
    • Superego: The moral conscience that incorporates the values and morals of society and instills feelings of guilt.
  • Theological Tripartition of Man: In Christian theology, the trichotomist view holds that humankind is composed of three distinct components: body, spirit, and soul. Some interpretations suggest the soul governs intellect and emotion, while the spirit connects to the divine.

A modern tripartite framework

Even in modern self-help and psychology, the three-part framework persists. A recent example from therapist Phil Stutz (popularized in the documentary Stutz) posits that reality is defined by three unavoidable aspects:

  1. Pain: The unavoidable suffering and hardship in life.
  2. Uncertainty: The fact that we cannot know what will happen.
  3. Constant Work: The continuous effort required to maintain and improve our lives.

H.O.B. note: The last example sounds very much like a reinvented Buddhist theme.

Let me also note for the next selection, I used the word "Universe" instead of "Existence" and "Reality", to see what the AI would come up with. There is a slight difference in that it at least mentions a scientific model example... but overall, the only thing that is different is in the wording for similar references used elsewhere. I place the selection here and not the next collection because it is related to the former two ideas.

[7] Internet query: " "Recurring Rripartite Aspects of the Universe"

AI (overview) response: Recurring tripartite aspects of the universe appear in fields ranging from cosmology to philosophy and mythology. These trinities often represent a complete whole or a fundamental rhythm of existence, such as a cycle of creation, preservation, and destruction.

Scientific models

In modern cosmology, the universe is described as having three main components based on observable evidence:

  • Normal matter: This is the visible matter that makes up stars, planets, and all life. It accounts for about 5% of the universe.
  • Dark matter: An invisible, unconfirmed form of matter that makes up about 27% of the universe. Its presence is inferred through its gravitational effects on galaxies and clusters.
  • Dark energy: A mysterious force responsible for the accelerating expansion of the universe. It is the most abundant component, making up roughly 68% of the universe's mass-energy.

Philosophical and psychological concepts

Philosophical traditions have also explored tripartite models for understanding reality:

  • Karl Popper's Three Worlds: This theory divides reality into three distinct, interacting realms:
    • World 1: The world of physical objects and events.
    • World 2: The world of mental states and consciousness.
    • World 3: The cultural realm of objective knowledge, including scientific theories, stories, and art created by the human mind.
  • Tripartite view of knowledge: Attributed to Plato, this classical model states that knowledge consists of three parts: a person must have a justified, true belief for that belief to count as knowledge.

Mythological and religious cosmologies

Many of the world's mythologies and religions feature a three-part universe, typically composed of celestial, terrestrial, and subterranean realms:

  • Greek and Roman mythology: Features the heavens (Olympus), Earth, and the underworld (Hades). In Greek mythology, the three Fates were also a triple deity, controlling the threads of life, destiny, and death.
  • Ancient Near East and Scythian cosmology: Depicts a three-tiered universe of the heavens, the earthly realm, and the underworld.
  • Hinduism: The universe is governed by the Trimurti, a divine triad of Brahma (the creator), Vishnu (the preserver), and Shiva (the destroyer), which represents the cosmic cycle.
  • Norse mythology: The world tree Yggdrasil connects three main worlds: Asgard (realm of the gods), Midgard (realm of humans), and Hel (the underworld).
  • Buddhism: The "Three Worlds" or Triloka are realms of existence that beings cycle through: the desire realm, the form realm, and the formless realm. The goal of enlightenment is to transcend them.

Spiritual and metaphysical models

Tripartite structures also appear in spiritual and metaphysical frameworks:

  • Christian theology: The tripartite view (trichotomy) suggests that human beings are composed of three distinct parts: body, soul, and spirit.
  • Neopaganism and Wicca: The Triple Goddess is a common deity concept, with her three aspects—the Maiden, the Mother, and the Crone—representing the cycles of life and feminine power.
  • Celtic mythology: Often features triple deities, such as battle-furies or goddesses of sovereignty, which embody complex aspects of the divine.


Page initially created:Thursday, Sept. 4th, 2025... 6:39 AM
Initial posting: Thursday, Sept. 4th, 2025... 1:429 PM